Spodumene is the main player in the extraction of lithium from hard rock deposits. In Brazil, the primary lithium deposits are the spodumene-rich pegmatites (SRPs) of the Araçuaí Pegmatite District. These pegmatites contain up to 30% of coarse-grained spodumene crystals dispersed in a quartz-feldspars-muscovite matrix and form rather homogeneous ore bodies. In the study area SRPs are closely spatially associated to large volumes of barren pegmatites and two-mica granites. The relation between barren and mineralized pegmatites as well as the formation mechanism of SRPs in this region and elsewhere remains puzzling. We present U-Pb geochronological data on columbite-tantalite and compositional data for muscovite, apatite and columbite-tantalite. Columbite-tantalite U-Pb analyses from SRP yielded a lower intercept age of 525 ± 16 Ma, overlapping the crystallization age of the two-mica granites (528 ± 13 Ma). The Fe/Mn in columbite-tantalite and muscovite, Th/U of apatite, and the Sn and Zn elemental concentration in muscovite and apatite are all chemical proxies that can be used to distinguish between SRP, barren pegmatites, and two-mica granite as well as between different samples along the profile of the SRP. Instead, Rb/Cs and Nb/Ta largest variations are expressed internal to single samples, or even single crystals, as observed via trace element mapping of muscovite. The co-variation in the concentration of fluid mobile and immobile elements (Zn, Sn vs U, Th, Rb) in muscovite and apatite support the limited importance of a free fluid phase during the crystallization of the SRP. Geochronological data support a coeval origin for SRP and two-mica granite; on the contrary, mineral chemistry data are not compatible with a direct genetic link between these lithologies. The chemical composition of muscovite, apatite and columbite-tantalite is a valid indicator of the degree of differentiation and rare-elements enrichment among various products of granitic magmatism, and permitted to address important questions regarding the genesis of SRPs. We stress as the absence (or limited importance) of a free fluid, and a depletion in some fluxing elements (i.e. B and F), are fundamental characteristics in the genesis of SRPs, favouring the crystallization of spodumene as the main Li-bearing phase.
Mechanisms of formation of spodumene-rich pegmatites in the Araçuaí Pegmatite District, Minas Gerais, Brazil / A. De Leo, A.C. Pedrosa-Soares, C. Lana, F. Farina. ((Intervento presentato al convegno Goldschmidt tenutosi a Prague nel 2025.
Mechanisms of formation of spodumene-rich pegmatites in the Araçuaí Pegmatite District, Minas Gerais, Brazil
A. De Leo
;F. Farina
2025
Abstract
Spodumene is the main player in the extraction of lithium from hard rock deposits. In Brazil, the primary lithium deposits are the spodumene-rich pegmatites (SRPs) of the Araçuaí Pegmatite District. These pegmatites contain up to 30% of coarse-grained spodumene crystals dispersed in a quartz-feldspars-muscovite matrix and form rather homogeneous ore bodies. In the study area SRPs are closely spatially associated to large volumes of barren pegmatites and two-mica granites. The relation between barren and mineralized pegmatites as well as the formation mechanism of SRPs in this region and elsewhere remains puzzling. We present U-Pb geochronological data on columbite-tantalite and compositional data for muscovite, apatite and columbite-tantalite. Columbite-tantalite U-Pb analyses from SRP yielded a lower intercept age of 525 ± 16 Ma, overlapping the crystallization age of the two-mica granites (528 ± 13 Ma). The Fe/Mn in columbite-tantalite and muscovite, Th/U of apatite, and the Sn and Zn elemental concentration in muscovite and apatite are all chemical proxies that can be used to distinguish between SRP, barren pegmatites, and two-mica granite as well as between different samples along the profile of the SRP. Instead, Rb/Cs and Nb/Ta largest variations are expressed internal to single samples, or even single crystals, as observed via trace element mapping of muscovite. The co-variation in the concentration of fluid mobile and immobile elements (Zn, Sn vs U, Th, Rb) in muscovite and apatite support the limited importance of a free fluid phase during the crystallization of the SRP. Geochronological data support a coeval origin for SRP and two-mica granite; on the contrary, mineral chemistry data are not compatible with a direct genetic link between these lithologies. The chemical composition of muscovite, apatite and columbite-tantalite is a valid indicator of the degree of differentiation and rare-elements enrichment among various products of granitic magmatism, and permitted to address important questions regarding the genesis of SRPs. We stress as the absence (or limited importance) of a free fluid, and a depletion in some fluxing elements (i.e. B and F), are fundamental characteristics in the genesis of SRPs, favouring the crystallization of spodumene as the main Li-bearing phase.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
31852.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
79.41 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
79.41 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




