The peri-implant bone density can determine long-term maintenance of the implant osteointegration. Thus, numerous types of research have been done to increase the quality and quantity of the peri-implant alveolar bone to improve implant survival and reduce the healing period. Many in vivo and in vitro studies have demonstrated that implant surfaces can influence cellular response and peri-implant bone. This work aimed to evaluate the role of the implant surface in protein absorption. Biochemical analyses were performed on 80 implants, 40 sandblasted/acid-etched (C = control), and 40 sandblasted/acid-etched and treated with cold plasma (T = test). Protein absorption in C and T surfaces was 2.15 ± 0.47 mg/ml and 2.66 ± 0.48 mg/ml, respectively. The difference in protein absorption between C and T implants was statistically significant (***P < 0.001). In conclusion, since the chemical composition, shape, and size of the C and T implants were similar, we can state that the cold plasma treatment determined the differences in protein adsorption observed.

Protein adsorption on implant surfaces treated with atmospheric plasma / A. Scarano, S.A. Gehrke, F.S. Al-Hamed, M. Nicotra, G. Di Palma, S.R. Tari. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASES. - ISSN 2038-4106. - 13:2(2024), pp. S45-S49.

Protein adsorption on implant surfaces treated with atmospheric plasma

S.R. Tari
Ultimo
2024

Abstract

The peri-implant bone density can determine long-term maintenance of the implant osteointegration. Thus, numerous types of research have been done to increase the quality and quantity of the peri-implant alveolar bone to improve implant survival and reduce the healing period. Many in vivo and in vitro studies have demonstrated that implant surfaces can influence cellular response and peri-implant bone. This work aimed to evaluate the role of the implant surface in protein absorption. Biochemical analyses were performed on 80 implants, 40 sandblasted/acid-etched (C = control), and 40 sandblasted/acid-etched and treated with cold plasma (T = test). Protein absorption in C and T surfaces was 2.15 ± 0.47 mg/ml and 2.66 ± 0.48 mg/ml, respectively. The difference in protein absorption between C and T implants was statistically significant (***P < 0.001). In conclusion, since the chemical composition, shape, and size of the C and T implants were similar, we can state that the cold plasma treatment determined the differences in protein adsorption observed.
atmospheric plasma; cold plasma; dental implants; implant surface; peri-implant bone; protein adsorption
Settore MEDS-16/A - Malattie odontostomatologiche
2024
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
PROTEIN ADSORPTION ON IMPLANT SURFACES TREATED WITH ATMOSPHERIC PLASMA.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza: Nessuna licenza
Dimensione 637.73 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
637.73 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1174923
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact