In the Dictionaire historique et critique (1697), Pierre Bayle (1647–1706) included a short entry on Andrea Cesalpino that contains a few notes about his biography and intellectual significance. He wrote that Cesalpino “had been a highly skilled scholar in both philosophy and medicine. He was from Arezzo, and worked for a long period in Pisa, before becoming first physician of Pope Clement VIII. He died in Rome on February 23, 1603, aged 84 years.” Yet, he added something more. Influenced by Samuel Parker’s reading of Cesalpino and by the criticisms made by Nicolaus Taurellus (1547–1606), he wrote that Cesalpino “abandoned the way of ordinary Peripatetic scholars in many aspects and to put it bluntly he was a bad Christian with respect to his opinions. His principles barely differed from those of Spinoza,” while notin that “a modern author counts him among the greatest geniuses that has ever been seen.”
Andrea Cesalpino : An Introduction / F. Baldassarri And, C. Martin (BLOOMSBURY STUDIES IN THE ARISTOTELIAN TRADITION). - In: Andrea Cesalpino and Renaissance Aristotelianism: Natural Philosophy in the Sixteenth Century / [a cura di] F. Baldassarri, M. Craig. - London : Bloomsbury, 2023. - ISBN 9781350325173. - pp. 1-14 [10.5040/9781350325173.ch-1]
Andrea Cesalpino : An Introduction
F. Baldassarri And;C. Martin
2023
Abstract
In the Dictionaire historique et critique (1697), Pierre Bayle (1647–1706) included a short entry on Andrea Cesalpino that contains a few notes about his biography and intellectual significance. He wrote that Cesalpino “had been a highly skilled scholar in both philosophy and medicine. He was from Arezzo, and worked for a long period in Pisa, before becoming first physician of Pope Clement VIII. He died in Rome on February 23, 1603, aged 84 years.” Yet, he added something more. Influenced by Samuel Parker’s reading of Cesalpino and by the criticisms made by Nicolaus Taurellus (1547–1606), he wrote that Cesalpino “abandoned the way of ordinary Peripatetic scholars in many aspects and to put it bluntly he was a bad Christian with respect to his opinions. His principles barely differed from those of Spinoza,” while notin that “a modern author counts him among the greatest geniuses that has ever been seen.”| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
9781350325173.ch-1.pdf
accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza:
Nessuna licenza
Dimensione
500.86 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
500.86 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




