Introduction: Real-world data comparing patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) initially treated with upadacitinib versus those previously treated with biologics or other JAK inhibitors are limited. Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study of 524 patients with moderate-to-severe AD treated with upadacitinib to assess clinical outcomes over 52 weeks. A sub-analysis of 316 patients compared outcomes between those who had previously failed Th2 biologics (group A) and those who discontinued these treatments for reasons other than inefficacy or were bio-naïve (group B), using a Propensity Score matching method. Results: A significant clinical improvement starting from week 4 and continuing throughout the study period was observed in the overall population and both in group A and B. Group B showed greater improvements at later follow-up times, with a higher median EASI (Eczema Area and Severity Index) percentage improvement at week 52 (p=0.030), a significantly higher proportion of patients achieving EASI-90 and EASI-100 at week 36 (p=0.023, χ²=9.497). As for the P-NRS (Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale) and SD-NRS (Sleep Distrubances Numerical Rating Scale), group B had a significantly greater percentage of patients reporting a score of 0 or 1 at week 52 (P-NRS: p=0.017, χ²=5.665; SD-NRS: p=0.049, χ²=3.870). Group B also had a significantly higher percentage of patients reaching minimal disease activiy at week 52 (p=0.014, χ²=5.980). Conclusion: Upadacitinib proved to be effective in the long term not only as a first-line therapy but also in patients with a history of biologic treatment failure. However, patients in Group B consistently demonstrated better clinical responses at later follow-ups, suggesting that bio-naïve individuals and those who discontinued Th2 biologics for reasons other than inefficacy may respond more favorably to upadacitinib.
Effectiveness and Safety of Upadacitinib in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis and Previous Failures of Th2 Biologics: A Propensity Score-Matched Study / F. Barei, A. Chiei-Gallo, A. Narcisi, R.C. Ingurgio, P. Malagoli, G. Girolomoni, M. Maurelli, E. Pezzolo, C. Sciarrone, M. Gola, M. Magliulo, P. Savoia, E. Esposto, A.G. Burroni, F. Amoruso, V.G. Bianchi, S.R. Mercuri, F. Satolli, M.B. De Felici Del Giudice, P. Pella, R. Pinto, G. Avallone, C. Gurioli, B.M. Piraccini, A. Balato, E.V. Di Brizzi, R.G. Angileri, F. Manzo Margiotta, M. Romanelli, M. Rossi, M.B. Guanti, G. Lauretta, S. Dastoli, C. Patruno, M. Napolitano, M. Ortoncelli, S. Ribero, A.V. Marzano, S. Ferrucci. - In: CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY. - ISSN 0307-6938. - (2025). [Epub ahead of print] [10.1093/ced/llaf253]
Effectiveness and Safety of Upadacitinib in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis and Previous Failures of Th2 Biologics: A Propensity Score-Matched Study
A. Chiei-GalloSecondo
;R. Pinto;G. Avallone;A.V. MarzanoPenultimo
;
2025
Abstract
Introduction: Real-world data comparing patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) initially treated with upadacitinib versus those previously treated with biologics or other JAK inhibitors are limited. Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study of 524 patients with moderate-to-severe AD treated with upadacitinib to assess clinical outcomes over 52 weeks. A sub-analysis of 316 patients compared outcomes between those who had previously failed Th2 biologics (group A) and those who discontinued these treatments for reasons other than inefficacy or were bio-naïve (group B), using a Propensity Score matching method. Results: A significant clinical improvement starting from week 4 and continuing throughout the study period was observed in the overall population and both in group A and B. Group B showed greater improvements at later follow-up times, with a higher median EASI (Eczema Area and Severity Index) percentage improvement at week 52 (p=0.030), a significantly higher proportion of patients achieving EASI-90 and EASI-100 at week 36 (p=0.023, χ²=9.497). As for the P-NRS (Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale) and SD-NRS (Sleep Distrubances Numerical Rating Scale), group B had a significantly greater percentage of patients reporting a score of 0 or 1 at week 52 (P-NRS: p=0.017, χ²=5.665; SD-NRS: p=0.049, χ²=3.870). Group B also had a significantly higher percentage of patients reaching minimal disease activiy at week 52 (p=0.014, χ²=5.980). Conclusion: Upadacitinib proved to be effective in the long term not only as a first-line therapy but also in patients with a history of biologic treatment failure. However, patients in Group B consistently demonstrated better clinical responses at later follow-ups, suggesting that bio-naïve individuals and those who discontinued Th2 biologics for reasons other than inefficacy may respond more favorably to upadacitinib.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
llaf253.pdf
embargo fino al 11/06/2026
Tipologia:
Post-print, accepted manuscript ecc. (versione accettata dall'editore)
Dimensione
811.37 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
811.37 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




