IntroductionThere is a general need for sharing practical examples of Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) within the research field to learn from and inspire. The aim of this article is to describe our process evaluation of PPI within the development process of the EUonQoL-Kit, a new set of quality of life questionnaires aimed at people with (past experience of) cancer.MethodsFive co-researchers (people with cancer and informal caregivers) were recruited and received training and support from a dedicated team of researchers. Involvement in the development process of the EUonQoL-Kit consisted of four major events: two workshops, a consensus meeting and a stakeholder forum. We have collected event documents, that is, meeting agendas, presentation slides, minutes of the events and minutes of meetings with co-researchers before and after the events, and qualitatively analysed these using the Cube Framework.ResultsOur process evaluation showed that, over time, discussions evolved from focusing on the technical aspects of the EUonQoL-Kit to co-researchers' experiences as input for the questionnaires. Researchers' inexperience with PPI prompted the organisation of a training workshop. After this, researchers prepared the co-researchers better for the meetings and engaged them more actively by asking specific questions. All these developments contributed to a more active participation of co-researchers.ConclusionPPI in the development process of the EUonQoL-Kit was a learning process. Factors that helped include allocating time and resources, actively creating space for co-researchers' input, providing support by researchers specifically responsible for the PPI activities and realising the importance of informal contact. Future PPI efforts should incorporate these principles from the start to facilitate successful collaboration between researchers and co-researchers.Patient or Public ContributionPeople with cancer and informal caregivers played a significant role in this study. They were involved as co-researchers in all stages of the development process of the EUonQoL-Kit. In addition, they were involved in the qualitative analysis of the data presented in this article, the writing of the project report and the writing of this article as co-authors.

Evaluating the Involvement of People With Cancer and Informal Caregivers in the Development Process of a New Set of Quality of Life Questionnaires / M. Engelaar, F. Van Schelven, N. Bos, M. L'Hote, C. Rialland, N. Couespel, C. Dantas, C. Higgins, T. Kalmi, I. Minnée-van Braak, L. Pinnavaia, G. Apolone, C. Brunelli, A. Caraceni, M. Ferrer, M. Groenvold, S. Kaasa, G. Ciliberto, C. Lombardo, R. Pietrobon, G. Pravettoni, A. Sirven, H. Vachon, G. Velikova, J. Rademakers. - In: HEALTH EXPECTATIONS. - ISSN 1369-7625. - 28:3(2025), pp. e70267.1-e70267.10.

Evaluating the Involvement of People With Cancer and Informal Caregivers in the Development Process of a New Set of Quality of Life Questionnaires

L. Pinnavaia;A. Caraceni;G. Pravettoni;
2025

Abstract

IntroductionThere is a general need for sharing practical examples of Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) within the research field to learn from and inspire. The aim of this article is to describe our process evaluation of PPI within the development process of the EUonQoL-Kit, a new set of quality of life questionnaires aimed at people with (past experience of) cancer.MethodsFive co-researchers (people with cancer and informal caregivers) were recruited and received training and support from a dedicated team of researchers. Involvement in the development process of the EUonQoL-Kit consisted of four major events: two workshops, a consensus meeting and a stakeholder forum. We have collected event documents, that is, meeting agendas, presentation slides, minutes of the events and minutes of meetings with co-researchers before and after the events, and qualitatively analysed these using the Cube Framework.ResultsOur process evaluation showed that, over time, discussions evolved from focusing on the technical aspects of the EUonQoL-Kit to co-researchers' experiences as input for the questionnaires. Researchers' inexperience with PPI prompted the organisation of a training workshop. After this, researchers prepared the co-researchers better for the meetings and engaged them more actively by asking specific questions. All these developments contributed to a more active participation of co-researchers.ConclusionPPI in the development process of the EUonQoL-Kit was a learning process. Factors that helped include allocating time and resources, actively creating space for co-researchers' input, providing support by researchers specifically responsible for the PPI activities and realising the importance of informal contact. Future PPI efforts should incorporate these principles from the start to facilitate successful collaboration between researchers and co-researchers.Patient or Public ContributionPeople with cancer and informal caregivers played a significant role in this study. They were involved as co-researchers in all stages of the development process of the EUonQoL-Kit. In addition, they were involved in the qualitative analysis of the data presented in this article, the writing of the project report and the writing of this article as co-authors.
English
quality of life; validation; co-researchers; Europe; oncology; patient and public involvement; patient participation
Settore MEDS-05/A - Medicina interna
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Ricerca applicata
Pubblicazione scientifica
   Quality of Life in Oncology: measuring what matters for cancer patients and survivors in Europe (EUonQoL)
   EUonQoL
   EUROPEAN COMMISSION
   101096362
2025
28
3
e70267
1
10
10
Pubblicato
Periodico con rilevanza internazionale
manual
Aderisco
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Evaluating the Involvement of People With Cancer and Informal Caregivers in the Development Process of a New Set of Quality of Life Questionnaires / M. Engelaar, F. Van Schelven, N. Bos, M. L'Hote, C. Rialland, N. Couespel, C. Dantas, C. Higgins, T. Kalmi, I. Minnée-van Braak, L. Pinnavaia, G. Apolone, C. Brunelli, A. Caraceni, M. Ferrer, M. Groenvold, S. Kaasa, G. Ciliberto, C. Lombardo, R. Pietrobon, G. Pravettoni, A. Sirven, H. Vachon, G. Velikova, J. Rademakers. - In: HEALTH EXPECTATIONS. - ISSN 1369-7625. - 28:3(2025), pp. e70267.1-e70267.10.
open
Prodotti della ricerca::01 - Articolo su periodico
25
262
Article (author)
Periodico con Impact Factor
M. Engelaar, F. Van Schelven, N. Bos, M. L'Hote, C. Rialland, N. Couespel, C. Dantas, C. Higgins, T. Kalmi, I. Minnée-van Braak, L. Pinnavaia, G. Apol...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Health Expectations - 2025 - Engelaar - Evaluating the Involvement of People With Cancer and Informal Caregivers in the.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 526.37 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
526.37 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1168204
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact