Background and aim of the study: Scientific Societies do not recommend the use of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing as a first-tier screening for microdeletion and microduplication syndromes (MMs). The aim of this study was to review the current available literature on the performance of cell-free DNA as a screening for MMs. Methods: Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched electronically from 2000 to January 2020 and articles reporting the diagnostic performance of cfDNA screening for MMs in large (>5000 cases) series were included. Between-study heterogeneity and random effect model for screen positive rate (SPR), false positive rate (FPR) and positive predictive value (PPV) were calculated. Results: We identified 42 papers, seven included, for a total of 474,189 pregnancies and 210 cases of MMs. Diagnostic verification of positive cases was available overall in 486 (71.68 %) of 678 cases. The weighted pooled SPR, FPR and PPV were 0.19% (95% CI = 0.09–0.33), 0.07 (95% CI = 0.02–0.15) and 44.1 (95% CI = 31.49–63.07). In conclusion, the pooled PPV of cfDNA testing in screening for MMs was about 40%, ranging from 29% to 91%, for an overall FPR <0.1%. Conclusions: No confirmatory analysis was available in cases that did not undergo invasive testing, which were the vast majority of cases with a negative test, and therefore, the DR and the negative predictive value cannot be determined.

Cell‐free DNA analysis of maternal blood in prenatal screening for chromosomal microdeletions and microduplications: a systematic review / A. Familiari, S. Boito, G. Rembouskos, B. Ischia, V. Accurti, I. Fabietti, P. Volpe, N. Persico. - In: PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS. - ISSN 0197-3851. - 41:10(2021), pp. 1324-1331. [10.1002/pd.5928]

Cell‐free DNA analysis of maternal blood in prenatal screening for chromosomal microdeletions and microduplications: a systematic review

B. Ischia;I. Fabietti;N. Persico
Ultimo
2021

Abstract

Background and aim of the study: Scientific Societies do not recommend the use of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing as a first-tier screening for microdeletion and microduplication syndromes (MMs). The aim of this study was to review the current available literature on the performance of cell-free DNA as a screening for MMs. Methods: Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched electronically from 2000 to January 2020 and articles reporting the diagnostic performance of cfDNA screening for MMs in large (>5000 cases) series were included. Between-study heterogeneity and random effect model for screen positive rate (SPR), false positive rate (FPR) and positive predictive value (PPV) were calculated. Results: We identified 42 papers, seven included, for a total of 474,189 pregnancies and 210 cases of MMs. Diagnostic verification of positive cases was available overall in 486 (71.68 %) of 678 cases. The weighted pooled SPR, FPR and PPV were 0.19% (95% CI = 0.09–0.33), 0.07 (95% CI = 0.02–0.15) and 44.1 (95% CI = 31.49–63.07). In conclusion, the pooled PPV of cfDNA testing in screening for MMs was about 40%, ranging from 29% to 91%, for an overall FPR <0.1%. Conclusions: No confirmatory analysis was available in cases that did not undergo invasive testing, which were the vast majority of cases with a negative test, and therefore, the DR and the negative predictive value cannot be determined.
cell-free DNA; fetal cells; fetal diseases; fetal genetic analysis; fetal medicine and diagnostic procedures; genetic counseling; noninvasive prenatal testing; nucleic acids & proteins; whole genome sequencing
Settore MEDS-21/A - Ginecologia e ostetricia
2021
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Prenatal Diagnosis - 2021 - Familiari - Cell‐free DNA analysis of maternal blood in prenatal screening for chromosomal.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza: Nessuna licenza
Dimensione 424.73 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
424.73 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1167601
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 18
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 17
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact