The “rear window” on the Constitutional Court: search for political legitimacy or necessary modernization?–Looking at the constitutional courts, the claim that courts “speak” only through their decisions seems to be long gone. Instead, we are witnessing an increasingly massive use of different communication tools (social networks, websites, podcasts, interaction of individual judges with sectors of civil society, press conferences and press releases, video footage of hearings). This paper will concentrate on one of these strategies, namely the presence of cameras in courtrooms, which is aimed at opening a window on the Courts and making individual judges and their work known to the public, without any mediation. The study of this strategy ultimately aims to investigate the reasons behind it: is it a necessary modernization? Does it hide pedagogical intentions? Or rather, is it a search for legitimization and popular consensus?
La finestra sulla Corte costituzionale: modernizzazione necessaria, ricerca di legittimazione o finalità educativa? / A. Osti. - In: DPCE ONLINE. - ISSN 2037-6677. - 2025:PS1(2025), pp. 1211-1228. (Intervento presentato al convegno Giurisdizioni costituzionali e poteri politici. Riflessioni in chiave comparata tenutosi a Milano nel 2023).
La finestra sulla Corte costituzionale: modernizzazione necessaria, ricerca di legittimazione o finalità educativa?
A. Osti
2025
Abstract
The “rear window” on the Constitutional Court: search for political legitimacy or necessary modernization?–Looking at the constitutional courts, the claim that courts “speak” only through their decisions seems to be long gone. Instead, we are witnessing an increasingly massive use of different communication tools (social networks, websites, podcasts, interaction of individual judges with sectors of civil society, press conferences and press releases, video footage of hearings). This paper will concentrate on one of these strategies, namely the presence of cameras in courtrooms, which is aimed at opening a window on the Courts and making individual judges and their work known to the public, without any mediation. The study of this strategy ultimately aims to investigate the reasons behind it: is it a necessary modernization? Does it hide pedagogical intentions? Or rather, is it a search for legitimization and popular consensus?| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
DPCEonline_OSTI.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
335.58 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
335.58 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




