The “rear window” on the Constitutional Court: search for political legitimacy or necessary modernization?–Looking at the constitutional courts, the claim that courts “speak” only through their decisions seems to be long gone. Instead, we are witnessing an increasingly massive use of different communication tools (social networks, websites, podcasts, interaction of individual judges with sectors of civil society, press conferences and press releases, video footage of hearings). This paper will concentrate on one of these strategies, namely the presence of cameras in courtrooms, which is aimed at opening a window on the Courts and making individual judges and their work known to the public, without any mediation. The study of this strategy ultimately aims to investigate the reasons behind it: is it a necessary modernization? Does it hide pedagogical intentions? Or rather, is it a search for legitimization and popular consensus?

La finestra sulla Corte costituzionale: modernizzazione necessaria, ricerca di legittimazione o finalità educativa? / A. Osti. - In: DPCE ONLINE. - ISSN 2037-6677. - 2025:PS1(2025), pp. 1211-1228. (Intervento presentato al convegno Giurisdizioni costituzionali e poteri politici. Riflessioni in chiave comparata tenutosi a Milano nel 2023).

La finestra sulla Corte costituzionale: modernizzazione necessaria, ricerca di legittimazione o finalità educativa?

A. Osti
2025

Abstract

The “rear window” on the Constitutional Court: search for political legitimacy or necessary modernization?–Looking at the constitutional courts, the claim that courts “speak” only through their decisions seems to be long gone. Instead, we are witnessing an increasingly massive use of different communication tools (social networks, websites, podcasts, interaction of individual judges with sectors of civil society, press conferences and press releases, video footage of hearings). This paper will concentrate on one of these strategies, namely the presence of cameras in courtrooms, which is aimed at opening a window on the Courts and making individual judges and their work known to the public, without any mediation. The study of this strategy ultimately aims to investigate the reasons behind it: is it a necessary modernization? Does it hide pedagogical intentions? Or rather, is it a search for legitimization and popular consensus?
Cameras; Civil society; Constitutional courts; Courtroom; Media and communication
Settore GIUR-11/B - Diritto pubblico comparato
Settore GIUR-05/A - Diritto costituzionale e pubblico
2025
https://doi.org/10.57660/dpceonline.2024.2333
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
DPCEonline_OSTI.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 335.58 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
335.58 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1166755
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact