Synthesising results across studies to recognise the causes of variation in outcomes and to reach an overall understanding of a problem is a crucial part of the scientific method. Until in recent times, the results of scientific findings have been summarised in narrative reviews where the summary of transparent and objective results have become increasingly difficult. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses, conducted by subsequent strict protocols to guarantee reproducibility and decrease bias, have become more common in the synthesis of evidence.
The synthesis of scientific shreds of evidence: a critical appraisal on systematic review and meta-analysis methodology / L. Bertolaccini, L. Spaggiari. - In: JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE. - ISSN 2072-1439. - 12:6(2020 Jun), pp. 3399-3403. [10.21037/jtd.2020.03.07]
The synthesis of scientific shreds of evidence: a critical appraisal on systematic review and meta-analysis methodology
L. Bertolaccini
;L. SpaggiariUltimo
2020
Abstract
Synthesising results across studies to recognise the causes of variation in outcomes and to reach an overall understanding of a problem is a crucial part of the scientific method. Until in recent times, the results of scientific findings have been summarised in narrative reviews where the summary of transparent and objective results have become increasingly difficult. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses, conducted by subsequent strict protocols to guarantee reproducibility and decrease bias, have become more common in the synthesis of evidence.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
37614-PB3-4578-R2.pdf
accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza:
Nessuna licenza
Dimensione
236.73 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
236.73 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




