Maize is a key crop for the livestock sector being able to produce different fodder. Among these, ear maize silage is widely used as an energy source in the diets of pigs, dairy cows and fattening cattle. Given the variability of rainfall, irrigation plays a relevant role to achieve both satisfactory productivity and product quality. In this context, it is essential to explore the sustainability of different irrigation methods for maize cultivation.In this study, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was applied to evaluate the environmental impact of maize farms using different irrigation systems: pivot, drip, flood, and hose irrigation. One ton of ear maize silage at 48% moisture content was selected as functional unit and a “from cradle to farm gate” was considered as system boundary . Primary inventory data were collected mainly by surveys and interviews with the farmers. The Environmental Footprint 3.1 method was used to assess 14 impact categories. The results do not allow to clearly identify the best irrigation method across all environmental impact categories, therefore highlighting the need of trade-offs. While yield is the primary driver of environmental impacts, the influence of irrigation remains significant. Climate change was found to range from 116.66 kg CO2 eq./t of ear maize for flood irrigation to 207.42 kg CO2 eq./t for hose irrigation. Water use varied from 2178.29 m³ depriv./t for pivot irrigation to 10380.65 m³ depriv./t for flood irrigation. Regarding the contribution analysis, changing the considered environmental impact the main contribution varies, for example nitrous oxide is the main responsible to climate change, ammonia to particulate matter and acidification while nitrate and ammonia emissions to marine eutrophication. In conclusion, this study provides a basis for evaluating different irrigation methods, emphasising that irrigation plays a significant role in the overall environmental impact of maize cultivation, regardless of the end product.

Environmental impact assessment of maize cultivation system considering different irrigation methods / F. Vigo, M. Zoli, D. Lovarelli, J. Bacenetti. - In: JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING. - ISSN 1974-7071. - 56:2(2025 May 12), pp. 1663.1-1663.23. [10.4081/jae.2025.1663]

Environmental impact assessment of maize cultivation system considering different irrigation methods

F. Vigo
Primo
;
M. Zoli
Secondo
;
D. Lovarelli
Penultimo
;
J. Bacenetti
Ultimo
2025

Abstract

Maize is a key crop for the livestock sector being able to produce different fodder. Among these, ear maize silage is widely used as an energy source in the diets of pigs, dairy cows and fattening cattle. Given the variability of rainfall, irrigation plays a relevant role to achieve both satisfactory productivity and product quality. In this context, it is essential to explore the sustainability of different irrigation methods for maize cultivation.In this study, Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was applied to evaluate the environmental impact of maize farms using different irrigation systems: pivot, drip, flood, and hose irrigation. One ton of ear maize silage at 48% moisture content was selected as functional unit and a “from cradle to farm gate” was considered as system boundary . Primary inventory data were collected mainly by surveys and interviews with the farmers. The Environmental Footprint 3.1 method was used to assess 14 impact categories. The results do not allow to clearly identify the best irrigation method across all environmental impact categories, therefore highlighting the need of trade-offs. While yield is the primary driver of environmental impacts, the influence of irrigation remains significant. Climate change was found to range from 116.66 kg CO2 eq./t of ear maize for flood irrigation to 207.42 kg CO2 eq./t for hose irrigation. Water use varied from 2178.29 m³ depriv./t for pivot irrigation to 10380.65 m³ depriv./t for flood irrigation. Regarding the contribution analysis, changing the considered environmental impact the main contribution varies, for example nitrous oxide is the main responsible to climate change, ammonia to particulate matter and acidification while nitrate and ammonia emissions to marine eutrophication. In conclusion, this study provides a basis for evaluating different irrigation methods, emphasising that irrigation plays a significant role in the overall environmental impact of maize cultivation, regardless of the end product.
Environmental sustainability; Life Cyle Assessment; Irrigation; Maize ear
Settore AGRI-04/B - Meccanica agraria
   Sviluppo dì un’applicazione mobile per una gestione economica-ambientale sostenibile dei sistemi irrigui nella coltura di mais (SMART WUE)
   SMART WUE
   REGIONE LOMBARDIA - Agricoltura
   ID domanda 202202314089
12-mag-2025
2025
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1663-Vigo_optimized.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Original Paper
Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.23 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.23 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
1663-Vigo_supplementary material.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Supplementary material
Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 440.33 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
440.33 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1164125
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
  • OpenAlex 0
social impact