Background and aims: Drug positioning in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients refractory to anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) is still debated. In a nationwide multicentre observational cohort, we aimed to compare the real-life effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib and vedolizumab as second-line for UC after anti-TNFs. Methods: Disease activity was evaluated at weeks 8, 26, and 52 ± 4. The primary outcome was to compare clinical remission (partial Mayo score (PMS) ≤2 with no subscore >1) at week 26. Secondary outcomes included comparative effectiveness for corticosteroid-free clinical remission (CFCR); biochemical, endoscopic, and histologic remission; combined corticosteroid-free clinical-objective remission; and treatment persistence. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used for all comparisons. Results: Overall, 134 tofacitinib- and 277 vedolizumab-treated UC patients were included. At week 26, no difference was observed between tofacitinib and vedolizumab for clinical remission (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.9; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.6 - 1.6). At week 8, tofacitinib was more effective in achieving CFCR (aOR: 1.7; 95 % CI: 1.0 - 2.7). Clinical, biochemical, endoscopic, and histologic outcomes showed no difference between tofacitinib and vedolizumab at weeks 26 and 52. In patients with baseline PMS ≥ 2, steroid use, or anti-TNF non-response no difference was found for clinical remission at week 26. Tofacitinib-treated patients were more likely to discontinue treatment (adjusted Hazard Ratio: 1.8; 95 % CI: 1.2 - 2.8). Safety was consistent with treatment profiles in UC. Conclusions: Tofacitinib and vedolizumab were equally effective and safe as second-line therapy in anti-TNFs experienced UC patients. Tofacitinib showed greater efficacy in inducing CFCR at week 8, but carried higher discontinuation risk.

Real-life effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib and vedolizumab as 2nd-line for ulcerative colitis after anti-TNFs: A multicenter cohort IGIBD study (VE2TO-UC) / D. Noviello, W. Fries, A. Orlando, F.S. Conforti, C. Bezzio, F. Castiglione, M.C. Fantini, E.V. Savarino, S. Festa, D.G. Ribaldone, G. Mocci, L. Grossi, C. Viganò, N. Imperatore, L. Ceccarelli, A.M. Carvalhas Gabrielli, G. Scardino, S. Saibeni, P. Balestrieri, M. Principi, M. Campigotto, A.G. Gravina, R. Spagnuolo, F. Scaldaferri, B. Neri, A. Di Sario, M. Baldoni, R. Di Mitri, E. Tettoni, S. Calderone, A. Armuzzi, F.S. Macaluso, M. Vecchi, M. Ventimiglia, F. Caprioli, C. De Francesco, N. Piazza O Sed, G. Marcozzi, A.D. Guarino, S. Onali, C. De Barba, G. Orrù, A. Laffusa. - In: DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE. - ISSN 1590-8658. - 57:7(2025 Jul), pp. 1419-1427. [10.1016/j.dld.2025.04.025]

Real-life effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib and vedolizumab as 2nd-line for ulcerative colitis after anti-TNFs: A multicenter cohort IGIBD study (VE2TO-UC)

D. Noviello
Primo
Conceptualization
;
M. Vecchi
Supervision
;
F. Caprioli
Ultimo
Supervision
;
2025

Abstract

Background and aims: Drug positioning in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients refractory to anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) is still debated. In a nationwide multicentre observational cohort, we aimed to compare the real-life effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib and vedolizumab as second-line for UC after anti-TNFs. Methods: Disease activity was evaluated at weeks 8, 26, and 52 ± 4. The primary outcome was to compare clinical remission (partial Mayo score (PMS) ≤2 with no subscore >1) at week 26. Secondary outcomes included comparative effectiveness for corticosteroid-free clinical remission (CFCR); biochemical, endoscopic, and histologic remission; combined corticosteroid-free clinical-objective remission; and treatment persistence. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used for all comparisons. Results: Overall, 134 tofacitinib- and 277 vedolizumab-treated UC patients were included. At week 26, no difference was observed between tofacitinib and vedolizumab for clinical remission (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.9; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.6 - 1.6). At week 8, tofacitinib was more effective in achieving CFCR (aOR: 1.7; 95 % CI: 1.0 - 2.7). Clinical, biochemical, endoscopic, and histologic outcomes showed no difference between tofacitinib and vedolizumab at weeks 26 and 52. In patients with baseline PMS ≥ 2, steroid use, or anti-TNF non-response no difference was found for clinical remission at week 26. Tofacitinib-treated patients were more likely to discontinue treatment (adjusted Hazard Ratio: 1.8; 95 % CI: 1.2 - 2.8). Safety was consistent with treatment profiles in UC. Conclusions: Tofacitinib and vedolizumab were equally effective and safe as second-line therapy in anti-TNFs experienced UC patients. Tofacitinib showed greater efficacy in inducing CFCR at week 8, but carried higher discontinuation risk.
Effectiveness; Real word evidence; Safety; Tofacitinib; Ulcerative colitis; Vedolizumab;
Settore MEDS-10/A - Gastroenterologia
lug-2025
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1163897
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
  • OpenAlex 1
social impact