Background: Febrile seizures (FS) are the most common neurological disorder in pediatric age. FS affect 2% to 12% of children and result from a complex interplay of genetic and environmental factors. Effective management and unambiguous recommendations are crucial for allocating health care resources efficiently and ensuring cost-effectiveness in treating FS. Methods: This systematic review compares existing guidelines to provide insights into FS management. Seven guidelines published between 1991 and 2021, from Japan, United Kingdom, United States, Mexico, India, and Italy, were included. Data extraction covered definitions, diagnostic criteria, hospital admission criteria, diagnostic tests, management, and prophylaxis recommendations. Results: Hospital admission criteria varied but typically included age <18 months and complex FS. Neuroimaging and lumbar puncture recommendations varied, with most guidelines suggesting limited use. Pharmacologic prophylaxis was generally discouraged for simple FS but considered only for high-risk cases, due to the benign nature of FS and the potential side effects of antiseizure medications. Conclusions: Guidelines on FS exhibit similarities and differences, highlighting the need for standardized management and improved parental education to enhance clinical outcomes and reduce economic and social costs associated with FS. Future research should focus on creating updated international guidelines and ensuring their practical implementation.

Febrile Seizures: A Systematic Review of Different Guidelines / A. Corsello, M.B. Marangoni, M. Macchi, L. Cozzi, C. Agostoni, G.P. Milani, R. Dilena. - In: PEDIATRIC NEUROLOGY. - ISSN 0887-8994. - 155:(2024), pp. 141-148. [10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2024.03.024]

Febrile Seizures: A Systematic Review of Different Guidelines

A. Corsello
Co-primo
;
M.B. Marangoni
Co-primo
;
M. Macchi
Secondo
;
C. Agostoni;G.P. Milani
Penultimo
;
2024

Abstract

Background: Febrile seizures (FS) are the most common neurological disorder in pediatric age. FS affect 2% to 12% of children and result from a complex interplay of genetic and environmental factors. Effective management and unambiguous recommendations are crucial for allocating health care resources efficiently and ensuring cost-effectiveness in treating FS. Methods: This systematic review compares existing guidelines to provide insights into FS management. Seven guidelines published between 1991 and 2021, from Japan, United Kingdom, United States, Mexico, India, and Italy, were included. Data extraction covered definitions, diagnostic criteria, hospital admission criteria, diagnostic tests, management, and prophylaxis recommendations. Results: Hospital admission criteria varied but typically included age <18 months and complex FS. Neuroimaging and lumbar puncture recommendations varied, with most guidelines suggesting limited use. Pharmacologic prophylaxis was generally discouraged for simple FS but considered only for high-risk cases, due to the benign nature of FS and the potential side effects of antiseizure medications. Conclusions: Guidelines on FS exhibit similarities and differences, highlighting the need for standardized management and improved parental education to enhance clinical outcomes and reduce economic and social costs associated with FS. Future research should focus on creating updated international guidelines and ensuring their practical implementation.
Antiseizure medications; Childhood fever; Convulsions prophylaxis; Febrile seizures; guidelines; Management; Pediatric neurology
Settore MEDS-20/A - Pediatria generale e specialistica
2024
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
PIIS0887899424000997.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Review Article
Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 736.72 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
736.72 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1163109
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact