Lung cancer patients generally receive several information regarding their illness characteristics and available intervention. Therefore, patients can experience confusion, leading to anxiety and distress that might damage the relationship with physicians and treatment adherence. Literature showed that implementing decision aid tools during consultation can promote patients’ knowledge and awareness about lung cancer and available oncological intervention, improving a shared decision-making process. However, not all lung cancer patients always appreciate decision aids’ implementation. The present qualitative study explored patients’ opinions and preferences regarding the implementation of decision aids during medical consultation. Twenty-two lung cancer patients who have already attended medical consultations for lung cancer voluntarily participated in four online focus groups carried out between January 2023 and December 2024. A thematic analysis with a bottom-up approach highlighted three main themes: the typology and number of information that patients would have received, the relevance of patient-and-doctor relationship, and the effects of providing additional decision-making tools on patients’ emotions and preferences. Findings showed controversial opinions among patients, highlighting the relevance of personalized intervention tailored to patients’ preferences. Practical implications are given.

The Implementation of Decision Aids During Medical Consultations for Lung Cancer Patients: A Focus Group Within I3LUNG Project / V. Sebri, P. Dorangricchia, D. Monzani, C. Marzorati, R. Grasso, L. Conti, G.L. Russo, L. Provenzano, A.D. Dumitrascu, G. Pravettoni. - In: JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION. - ISSN 0885-8195. - (2025 Jan 21), pp. 534428.1-534428.13. [10.1007/s13187-025-02566-6]

The Implementation of Decision Aids During Medical Consultations for Lung Cancer Patients: A Focus Group Within I3LUNG Project

P. Dorangricchia;C. Marzorati;R. Grasso;L. Conti;L. Provenzano;G. Pravettoni
Ultimo
2025

Abstract

Lung cancer patients generally receive several information regarding their illness characteristics and available intervention. Therefore, patients can experience confusion, leading to anxiety and distress that might damage the relationship with physicians and treatment adherence. Literature showed that implementing decision aid tools during consultation can promote patients’ knowledge and awareness about lung cancer and available oncological intervention, improving a shared decision-making process. However, not all lung cancer patients always appreciate decision aids’ implementation. The present qualitative study explored patients’ opinions and preferences regarding the implementation of decision aids during medical consultation. Twenty-two lung cancer patients who have already attended medical consultations for lung cancer voluntarily participated in four online focus groups carried out between January 2023 and December 2024. A thematic analysis with a bottom-up approach highlighted three main themes: the typology and number of information that patients would have received, the relevance of patient-and-doctor relationship, and the effects of providing additional decision-making tools on patients’ emotions and preferences. Findings showed controversial opinions among patients, highlighting the relevance of personalized intervention tailored to patients’ preferences. Practical implications are given.
Decision aids; Doctor-patient relationship; Focus group; Lung cancer patients; Shared decision-making
Settore PSIC-01/A - Psicologia generale
   Integrative science, Intelligent data platform for Individualized LUNG cancer care with Immunotherapy
   I3LUNG
   European Commission
   Horizon Europe Framework Programme
   101057695
21-gen-2025
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
the implementaion.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Article
Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 640.96 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
640.96 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1161015
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact