Taking a quotient roughly means changing the notion of equality on a given object, set or type. In a quantitative setting, equality naturally generalises to a distance, measuring how much elements are similar instead of just stating their equivalence. Hence, quotients can be understood quantitatively as a change of distance. Quotients are crucial in many constructions both in mathematics and computer science and have been widely studied using categorical tools. Among them, Lawvere’s doctrines stand out, providing a fairly simple functorial framework capable to unify many notions of quotient and related constructions. However, abstracting usual predicate logics, they cannot easily deal with quantitative settings. In this paper, we show how, combining doctrines and the calculus of relations, one can unify quantitative and usual quotients in a common picture. More in detail, we introduce relational doctrines as a functorial description of (the core of) the calculus of relations. Then, we define quotients and a universal construction adding them to any relational doctrine, generalising the quotient completion of existential elementary doctrine and also recovering many quantitative examples. This construction deals with an intensional notion of quotient and breaks extensional equality of morphisms. Then, we describe another construction forcing extensionality, showing how it abstracts several notions of separation in metric and topological structures.

Quotients and Extensionality in Relational Doctrines / F. Dagnino, F. Pasquali (LEIBNIZ INTERNATIONAL PROCEEDINGS IN INFORMATICS). - In: FSCD 2023 / [a cura di] M. Gaboardi, F. van Raamsdonk. - [s.l] : Schloss Dagstuhl : Leibniz Zentrum fur Informatik : Dagstuhl Publishing, 2023. - ISBN 9783959772778. - pp. 1-23 (( Intervento presentato al 8. convegno International Conference on Formal Structures for Computation and Deduction : 3 through 6 July tenutosi a Roma nel 2023 [10.4230/lipics.fscd.2023.25].

Quotients and Extensionality in Relational Doctrines

F. Pasquali
Ultimo
2023

Abstract

Taking a quotient roughly means changing the notion of equality on a given object, set or type. In a quantitative setting, equality naturally generalises to a distance, measuring how much elements are similar instead of just stating their equivalence. Hence, quotients can be understood quantitatively as a change of distance. Quotients are crucial in many constructions both in mathematics and computer science and have been widely studied using categorical tools. Among them, Lawvere’s doctrines stand out, providing a fairly simple functorial framework capable to unify many notions of quotient and related constructions. However, abstracting usual predicate logics, they cannot easily deal with quantitative settings. In this paper, we show how, combining doctrines and the calculus of relations, one can unify quantitative and usual quotients in a common picture. More in detail, we introduce relational doctrines as a functorial description of (the core of) the calculus of relations. Then, we define quotients and a universal construction adding them to any relational doctrine, generalising the quotient completion of existential elementary doctrine and also recovering many quantitative examples. This construction deals with an intensional notion of quotient and breaks extensional equality of morphisms. Then, we describe another construction forcing extensionality, showing how it abstracts several notions of separation in metric and topological structures.
Calculus of Relations; Hyperdoctrines; Metric Spaces; Quantitative Reasoning;
Settore MATH-01/A - Logica matematica
2023
Book Part (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
LIPIcs.FSCD.2023.25.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 989.8 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
989.8 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1158347
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 4
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact