Background: Postoperative physiotherapy is a cornerstone of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs, especially following lung resection. Despite its importance, the literature lacks clear recommendations and guidelines, particularly regarding the role of incentive spirometry (IS). This study aims to determine whether incentive spirometry offers additional benefits over early ambulation alone in patients undergoing lung resection for primary lung cancer. Methods: We conducted a retrospective case–control study at the European Institute of Oncology (IEO) involving patients who underwent lung resection from June 2020 to June 2022. Patients were divided into two cohorts: early ambulation alone (control group) and early ambulation with IS (IS group). The primary endpoint was the rate of postoperative pulmonary complications. Secondary endpoints included length of hospital stay and time to chest drain removal. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed based on age, sex, and BMI. Data were compared using Chi-squared and Student’s t-tests as appropriate. Results: A total of 304 patients were included, with 153 in the intervention group and 151 in the control group. After propensity-score matching, 52 patients from each cohort were compared. No significant differences were found between the groups regarding postoperative oxygen requirement, fever, atelectasis, residual pleural space, need for bronchoscopy toilette, and re-hospitalization rate. IS group showed trends toward shorter hospital stays and lower time to chest drain removal, though without reaching statistical significance. Conclusions: IS did not significantly improve postoperative outcomes compared to early ambulation alone in patients undergoing lung resection for primary lung cancer. More extensive, prospective, randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings.

The Role of Incentive Spirometry in Enhanced Recovery After Lung Cancer Resection: A Propensity Score-Matched Study / M. Casiraghi, R. Orlandi, L. Bertolaccini, A. Mazzella, L. Girelli, C. Diotti, G. Caffarena, S. Zanardi, F. Baggi, F. Petrella, P. Maisonneuve, L. Spaggiari. - In: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE. - ISSN 2077-0383. - 14:1(2024), pp. 100.1-100.10. [10.3390/jcm14010100]

The Role of Incentive Spirometry in Enhanced Recovery After Lung Cancer Resection: A Propensity Score-Matched Study

M. Casiraghi
Primo
;
R. Orlandi;L. Bertolaccini;L. Girelli;C. Diotti;G. Caffarena;F. Petrella;L. Spaggiari
Ultimo
2024

Abstract

Background: Postoperative physiotherapy is a cornerstone of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs, especially following lung resection. Despite its importance, the literature lacks clear recommendations and guidelines, particularly regarding the role of incentive spirometry (IS). This study aims to determine whether incentive spirometry offers additional benefits over early ambulation alone in patients undergoing lung resection for primary lung cancer. Methods: We conducted a retrospective case–control study at the European Institute of Oncology (IEO) involving patients who underwent lung resection from June 2020 to June 2022. Patients were divided into two cohorts: early ambulation alone (control group) and early ambulation with IS (IS group). The primary endpoint was the rate of postoperative pulmonary complications. Secondary endpoints included length of hospital stay and time to chest drain removal. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed based on age, sex, and BMI. Data were compared using Chi-squared and Student’s t-tests as appropriate. Results: A total of 304 patients were included, with 153 in the intervention group and 151 in the control group. After propensity-score matching, 52 patients from each cohort were compared. No significant differences were found between the groups regarding postoperative oxygen requirement, fever, atelectasis, residual pleural space, need for bronchoscopy toilette, and re-hospitalization rate. IS group showed trends toward shorter hospital stays and lower time to chest drain removal, though without reaching statistical significance. Conclusions: IS did not significantly improve postoperative outcomes compared to early ambulation alone in patients undergoing lung resection for primary lung cancer. More extensive, prospective, randomized trials are needed to confirm these findings.
ERAS; early ambulation; incentive spirometry; lung cancer; lung resection; physiotherapy
Settore MEDS-13/A - Chirurgia toracica
2024
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
JCM 2024.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 227.64 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
227.64 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1156513
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact