Phasing out individual housing of pre-weaned dairy calves highlights the need for feasible alternatives on-farm. Pair housing has been pointed out in literature, but little is known about how it is perceived by stakeholders. This work aimed at knowing Italian stakeholders’ opinion towards pair housing (PH) as alternative to individual housing (IH) of pre-weaned calves. An online survey was sent to farmers (F), veterinarians (V) and farm technicians (T), between November 2023 and April 2024 (Ethics Committee approval no. 75/23). 4 multiple choice and 9 Likert scale questions were selected for the evaluation of alternatives and for rating the importance attributed to the advantages of IH and PH. Descriptive analysis was performed. 122 stakeholders answered the survey (F, n=33; V, n=65; T, n=24). Most farmers evaluated PH as an alternative to IH both to improve calves’ welfare (88%) and as economically sustainable (88%). However, when asked if IH can be replaced by PH, only the 30% answered positively and the 48% agreed that it could be an intermediate phase between IH and group housing. Although fewer veterinarians and technicians perceived PH as an alternative both in terms of welfare improvement (66% V; 46% T) and economic sustainability (69% V; 63% T), they both agreed it can replace IH (66% V; 58% T) and be an intermediate phase (68% V; 67% T). Most farmers perceived important the advantages of IH (i.e. absence of cross-sucking, lower risk of respiratory and enteric disease spread; 78%, 88%, 91%), and less important the advantages of PH. On the contrary, no such cohesion was outlined in V and T, with different importance ratings given for the proposed advantages. These first results highlight the perception of PH as a possible alternative to IH, although discrepancies were found in stakeholders when asked if they agreed to replace it. Moreover, although advantages of IH were strongly perceived by farmers, a low perception of PH advantages was found, indicating the need for further knowledge dissemination in this field.

Is pair housing perceived by Italian stakeholders as an alternative to individual housing for pre-weaned calves? / G. Pesenti Rossi, A. Gastaldo, G. Boldrin, A. Motta, M. Borciani, E. Dalla Costa, S. Barbieri, G. Berteselli, E. Canali - In: Book of Abstracts of the 9th International Conference on the Welfare Assessment of Animals at Farm Level (WAFL)[s.l] : EAAP, 2024. - ISBN 979-12-210-6833-7. - pp. 34-34 (( Intervento presentato al 9. convegno International Conference on the Welfare Assessment of Animals at Farm Level (WAFL) tenutosi a Firenze nel 2024.

Is pair housing perceived by Italian stakeholders as an alternative to individual housing for pre-weaned calves?

G. Pesenti Rossi
Primo
;
G. Boldrin;E. Dalla Costa;S. Barbieri;G. Berteselli;E. Canali
2024

Abstract

Phasing out individual housing of pre-weaned dairy calves highlights the need for feasible alternatives on-farm. Pair housing has been pointed out in literature, but little is known about how it is perceived by stakeholders. This work aimed at knowing Italian stakeholders’ opinion towards pair housing (PH) as alternative to individual housing (IH) of pre-weaned calves. An online survey was sent to farmers (F), veterinarians (V) and farm technicians (T), between November 2023 and April 2024 (Ethics Committee approval no. 75/23). 4 multiple choice and 9 Likert scale questions were selected for the evaluation of alternatives and for rating the importance attributed to the advantages of IH and PH. Descriptive analysis was performed. 122 stakeholders answered the survey (F, n=33; V, n=65; T, n=24). Most farmers evaluated PH as an alternative to IH both to improve calves’ welfare (88%) and as economically sustainable (88%). However, when asked if IH can be replaced by PH, only the 30% answered positively and the 48% agreed that it could be an intermediate phase between IH and group housing. Although fewer veterinarians and technicians perceived PH as an alternative both in terms of welfare improvement (66% V; 46% T) and economic sustainability (69% V; 63% T), they both agreed it can replace IH (66% V; 58% T) and be an intermediate phase (68% V; 67% T). Most farmers perceived important the advantages of IH (i.e. absence of cross-sucking, lower risk of respiratory and enteric disease spread; 78%, 88%, 91%), and less important the advantages of PH. On the contrary, no such cohesion was outlined in V and T, with different importance ratings given for the proposed advantages. These first results highlight the perception of PH as a possible alternative to IH, although discrepancies were found in stakeholders when asked if they agreed to replace it. Moreover, although advantages of IH were strongly perceived by farmers, a low perception of PH advantages was found, indicating the need for further knowledge dissemination in this field.
Campo DC Valore Lingua
dc.authority.academicField2024 Settore AGRI-09/C - Zootecnia speciale en
dc.authority.anceserie Book of Abstracts en
dc.authority.people G. Pesenti Rossi en
dc.authority.people A. Gastaldo en
dc.authority.people G. Boldrin en
dc.authority.people A. Motta en
dc.authority.people M. Borciani en
dc.authority.people E. Dalla Costa en
dc.authority.people S. Barbieri en
dc.authority.people G. Berteselli en
dc.authority.people E. Canali en
dc.authority.project RL_DG-AGR22ECANA_01 en
dc.collection.id.s dfa8b9c3-2dce-748b-e053-3a05fe0a3a96 *
dc.collection.name 03 - Contributo in volume *
dc.contributor.appartenenza Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria e Scienze Animali *
dc.contributor.appartenenza.mi 140100 *
dc.contributor.area AREA MIN. 07 - Scienze agrarie e veterinarie *
dc.contributor.area AREA MIN. 07 - Scienze agrarie e veterinarie *
dc.contributor.area AREA MIN. 07 - Scienze agrarie e veterinarie *
dc.contributor.area AREA MIN. 07 - Scienze agrarie e veterinarie *
dc.contributor.area AREA MIN. 07 - Scienze agrarie e veterinarie *
dc.contributor.area AREA MIN. 07 - Scienze agrarie e veterinarie *
dc.date.accessioned 2025/03/20 12:51:10 -
dc.date.available 2025/03/20 12:51:10 -
dc.date.firstsubmission 2025/03/17 12:06:04 *
dc.date.issued 2024 -
dc.date.submission 2025/03/17 12:06:04 *
dc.description.abstracteng Phasing out individual housing of pre-weaned dairy calves highlights the need for feasible alternatives on-farm. Pair housing has been pointed out in literature, but little is known about how it is perceived by stakeholders. This work aimed at knowing Italian stakeholders’ opinion towards pair housing (PH) as alternative to individual housing (IH) of pre-weaned calves. An online survey was sent to farmers (F), veterinarians (V) and farm technicians (T), between November 2023 and April 2024 (Ethics Committee approval no. 75/23). 4 multiple choice and 9 Likert scale questions were selected for the evaluation of alternatives and for rating the importance attributed to the advantages of IH and PH. Descriptive analysis was performed. 122 stakeholders answered the survey (F, n=33; V, n=65; T, n=24). Most farmers evaluated PH as an alternative to IH both to improve calves’ welfare (88%) and as economically sustainable (88%). However, when asked if IH can be replaced by PH, only the 30% answered positively and the 48% agreed that it could be an intermediate phase between IH and group housing. Although fewer veterinarians and technicians perceived PH as an alternative both in terms of welfare improvement (66% V; 46% T) and economic sustainability (69% V; 63% T), they both agreed it can replace IH (66% V; 58% T) and be an intermediate phase (68% V; 67% T). Most farmers perceived important the advantages of IH (i.e. absence of cross-sucking, lower risk of respiratory and enteric disease spread; 78%, 88%, 91%), and less important the advantages of PH. On the contrary, no such cohesion was outlined in V and T, with different importance ratings given for the proposed advantages. These first results highlight the perception of PH as a possible alternative to IH, although discrepancies were found in stakeholders when asked if they agreed to replace it. Moreover, although advantages of IH were strongly perceived by farmers, a low perception of PH advantages was found, indicating the need for further knowledge dissemination in this field. -
dc.description.allpeople G. Pesenti Rossi, A. Gastaldo, G. Boldrin, A. Motta, M. Borciani, E. Dalla Costa, S. Barbieri, G. Berteselli, E. Canali -
dc.description.allpeopleoriginal G. Pesenti Rossi, A. Gastaldo, G. Boldrin, A. Motta, M. Borciani, E. Dalla Costa, S. Barbieri, G. Berteselli, E. Canali en
dc.description.fulltext reserved en
dc.description.international No en
dc.description.numberofauthors 9 -
dc.identifier.citation Is pair housing perceived by Italian stakeholders as an alternative to individual housing for pre-weaned calves? / G. Pesenti Rossi, A. Gastaldo, G. Boldrin, A. Motta, M. Borciani, E. Dalla Costa, S. Barbieri, G. Berteselli, E. Canali - In: Book of Abstracts of the 9th International Conference on the Welfare Assessment of Animals at Farm Level (WAFL)[s.l] : EAAP, 2024. - ISBN 979-12-210-6833-7. - pp. 34-34 (( Intervento presentato al 9. convegno International Conference on the Welfare Assessment of Animals at Farm Level (WAFL) tenutosi a Firenze nel 2024. en
dc.identifier.isbn 979-12-210-6833-7 en
dc.identifier.source manual *
dc.identifier.uri https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1154656 -
dc.iris.checkpolicy yes en
dc.language.iso eng en
dc.publisher.name EAAP en
dc.relation.conferencedate 2024 en
dc.relation.conferencename International Conference on the Welfare Assessment of Animals at Farm Level (WAFL) en
dc.relation.conferencenumber 9 en
dc.relation.conferenceplace Firenze en
dc.relation.conferencetargetaudience Convegno internazionale en
dc.relation.firstpage 34 en
dc.relation.ispartofbook Book of Abstracts of the 9th International Conference on the Welfare Assessment of Animals at Farm Level (WAFL) en
dc.relation.lastpage 34 en
dc.relation.numberofpages 1 en
dc.relation.projectAcronym Vitelli CAGE-FREE en
dc.relation.projectAwardNumber ID progetto 202202313938 en
dc.relation.projectAwardTitle Sistemi alternativi alla stabulazione dei vitelli pre-svezzamento in box individuali (Vitelli CAGE-FREE) en
dc.relation.projectFunderName REGIONE LOMBARDIA - Agricoltura en
dc.relation.projectFundingStream - en
dc.relation.volume 33 en
dc.title Is pair housing perceived by Italian stakeholders as an alternative to individual housing for pre-weaned calves? en
dc.type Book Part (author) -
dc.type.circulation Volume a diffusione internazionale en
dc.type.contribution Riassunto di intervento a convegno en
dc.type.driver info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart -
dc.type.full Prodotti della ricerca::03 - Contributo in volume it
dc.type.invited Intervento inviato en
dc.type.miur 274 en
dc.type.publication Pubblicazione scientifica en
dc.type.referee Esperti anonimi en
iris.mediafilter.data 2025/03/21 03:32:14 *
iris.openalex.ideErrorType MATCH_RESULT_STATUS_FAILURE_NO_MATCH *
iris.openalex.ideLastCallDate 20/11/2025 02:20:33 *
iris.openalex.ideLastCallMillisecond 1763601633452 *
iris.openalex.ideLastStatusDate 20/11/2025 02:20:33 *
iris.openalex.ideLastStatusMillisecond 1763601633452 *
iris.openalex.ideStatus ERROR *
iris.orcid.lastModifiedDate 2025/03/20 12:51:10 *
iris.orcid.lastModifiedMillisecond 1742471470931 *
iris.sitodocente.maxattempts 1 -
Appare nelle tipologie: 03 - Contributo in volume
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Pesenti Rossi et al _ survey_WAFL 2024.pdf

accesso riservato

Descrizione: Abstract
Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 215.33 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
215.33 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1154656
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact