This note reflects on two recent decisions rendered by the General Court of the European Union (“General Court”). The General Court was called to review two decisions by the European Commission to impose countervailing duties on imports from Egypt. The goods had benefited from subsidies which found their origin in Chinese financial contributions. According to the Commission, these transnational financial contributions amounted to a subsidy under EU countervailing duty law. Among other things, the General Court was called to determine whether transnational financial contributions were covered by the definition of subsidy embodied in the WTO. To the dismay of many observers, the General Court disposed of the issue on a literal reading of the WTO text, and with no significant supporting argumentation or evidence. This approach is in stark contrast to the importance of the issue decided. This note criticizes these two judgments and calls on the Court of Justice, which is hearing the appeals, to change course of action.

Are Transnational Subsidies Regulated by EU and WTO law? The General Court has spoken (Case T-480/20 and Case T-540/20) / L. Rubini. - (2023).

Are Transnational Subsidies Regulated by EU and WTO law? The General Court has spoken (Case T-480/20 and Case T-540/20).

L. Rubini
2023

Abstract

This note reflects on two recent decisions rendered by the General Court of the European Union (“General Court”). The General Court was called to review two decisions by the European Commission to impose countervailing duties on imports from Egypt. The goods had benefited from subsidies which found their origin in Chinese financial contributions. According to the Commission, these transnational financial contributions amounted to a subsidy under EU countervailing duty law. Among other things, the General Court was called to determine whether transnational financial contributions were covered by the definition of subsidy embodied in the WTO. To the dismay of many observers, the General Court disposed of the issue on a literal reading of the WTO text, and with no significant supporting argumentation or evidence. This approach is in stark contrast to the importance of the issue decided. This note criticizes these two judgments and calls on the Court of Justice, which is hearing the appeals, to change course of action.
subsidy; transnational subsidy; General Court; EU law; WTO law
Settore GIUR-09/A - Diritto internazionale
Settore GIUR-10/A - Diritto dell'unione europea
2023
https://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/75894
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
RSC_PP_2023_09.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 435.55 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
435.55 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1152943
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact