Melanoma is the deadliest form of skin cancer and it is diagnosed mainly visually, starting from initial clinical screening and followed by dermoscopic analysis, biopsy and histopathological examination. A dermatologist's recognition of melanoma may be subject to errors and may take some time to diagnose it. In this regard, deep learning can be useful in the study and classification of skin cancer. In particular, by classifying images with Deep Neural Network methodologies, it is possible to obtain comparable or even superior results compared to those of dermatologists. In this paper, we propose a methodology for the classification of melanoma by adopting different deep learning techniques applied to a common dataset, composed of images from the ISIC dataset and consisting of different types of skin diseases, including melanoma on which we applied a specific pre-processing phase. In particular, a comparison of the results is performed in order to select the best effective neural network to be applied to the problem of recognition and classification of melanoma. Moreover, we also evaluate the impact of the pre-processing phase on the final classification. Different metrics such as accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity have been selected to assess the goodness of the adopted neural networks and compare them also with the manual classification of dermatologists.

A Comparison of Neural Network Approaches for Melanoma Classification / M. Frasca, M. Nappi, M. Risi, G. Tortora, A.A. Citarella (INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PATTERN RECOGNITION). - In: 2020 25th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR)[s.l] : Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc., 2020. - ISBN 978-1-7281-8808-9. - pp. 2110-2117 (( Intervento presentato al 25. convegno 25th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, ICPR 2020 tenutosi a ita nel 2021 [10.1109/icpr48806.2021.9412893].

A Comparison of Neural Network Approaches for Melanoma Classification

M. Frasca;
2020

Abstract

Melanoma is the deadliest form of skin cancer and it is diagnosed mainly visually, starting from initial clinical screening and followed by dermoscopic analysis, biopsy and histopathological examination. A dermatologist's recognition of melanoma may be subject to errors and may take some time to diagnose it. In this regard, deep learning can be useful in the study and classification of skin cancer. In particular, by classifying images with Deep Neural Network methodologies, it is possible to obtain comparable or even superior results compared to those of dermatologists. In this paper, we propose a methodology for the classification of melanoma by adopting different deep learning techniques applied to a common dataset, composed of images from the ISIC dataset and consisting of different types of skin diseases, including melanoma on which we applied a specific pre-processing phase. In particular, a comparison of the results is performed in order to select the best effective neural network to be applied to the problem of recognition and classification of melanoma. Moreover, we also evaluate the impact of the pre-processing phase on the final classification. Different metrics such as accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity have been selected to assess the goodness of the adopted neural networks and compare them also with the manual classification of dermatologists.
Deep learning; Sensitivity; Neural networks; Melanoma; Medical services; Manuals; Sensitivity and specificity
Settore INFO-01/A - Informatica
2020
Book Part (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
A_Comparison_of_Neural_Network_Approaches_for_Melanoma_Classification 4.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 960.39 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
960.39 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1148775
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact