Background: Limited data are available on leadless pacemaker (LPM) outcomes according to different stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in the safety and efficacy of LPMs among patients stratified per different stages of renal function. Methods: Consecutive patients enrolled in the multicenter international i-LEAPER registry (International LEAdless PacemakEr Registry) were analyzed. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to CKD stage. The primary end point was the comparison of LPM-related major complication rate at implantation and during follow-up. Differences in electrical performance were deemed secondary outcomes. Results: Of the 1748 patients enrolled, 33% were in CKD stage G3a/G3b and 9.4% were in CKD stage G4/G5. Patients with CKD presented cardiovascular comorbidities more frequently. During a median follow-up of 39 months (interquartile range [IQR] 18–59 months), major complication rate did not differ between groups (normal kidney function [NKF] group 1.8% vs CKD stage G3a/G3b group 2.9% vs CKD stage G4/G5 group 2.4%; P = .418). All-cause mortality resulted higher in the CKD stage G4/G5 group than in the NKF group (19.5% vs 9.8%; adjusted hazard ratio 1.9; 95% confidence interval 1.25–2.89; P = .003). LPM electrical performance was comparable between groups, except for patients with CKD who showed a slightly higher pacing threshold during 1-month follow-up (NKF group 0.50 V [IQR 0.35–0.70 V] vs G3a/G3b group 0.56 V [IQR 0.38–0.81 V] vs G4/G5 group 0.51 V [0.38–0.84 V] @ 0.24 ms; P < .001). Conclusion: In a real-world setting, patients with advanced CKD who underwent LPM implantation were underrepresented. Although all-cause mortality was higher in end-stage CKD, periprocedural complications and LPM performance were overall comparable between NKF and different stages of CKD, except for higher values of pacing threshold in patients with CKD up to first-month follow-up.

Leadless pacemakers in patients with different stages of chronic kidney disease: Real-world data from the updated i-LEAPER registry / G. Mitacchione, M. Schiavone, A. Gasperetti, G.L. Tripepi, M. Cerini, E. Montemerlo, A. Del Monte, L. Bontempi, M. Moltrasio, A. Breitenstein, C. Monaco, P. Palmisano, G. Rovaris, G. Chierchia, A. Dello Russo, M. Biffi, C. De Asmundis, P. Mazzone, L. Di Biase, M. Gallieni, C. Tondo, A. Curnis, G.B. Forleo. - In: HEART RHYTHM. - ISSN 1547-5271. - 22:2(2025), pp. 325-331. [10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.07.027]

Leadless pacemakers in patients with different stages of chronic kidney disease: Real-world data from the updated i-LEAPER registry

M. Schiavone;A. Gasperetti;G. Chierchia;C. De Asmundis;M. Gallieni;C. Tondo;
2025

Abstract

Background: Limited data are available on leadless pacemaker (LPM) outcomes according to different stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in the safety and efficacy of LPMs among patients stratified per different stages of renal function. Methods: Consecutive patients enrolled in the multicenter international i-LEAPER registry (International LEAdless PacemakEr Registry) were analyzed. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to CKD stage. The primary end point was the comparison of LPM-related major complication rate at implantation and during follow-up. Differences in electrical performance were deemed secondary outcomes. Results: Of the 1748 patients enrolled, 33% were in CKD stage G3a/G3b and 9.4% were in CKD stage G4/G5. Patients with CKD presented cardiovascular comorbidities more frequently. During a median follow-up of 39 months (interquartile range [IQR] 18–59 months), major complication rate did not differ between groups (normal kidney function [NKF] group 1.8% vs CKD stage G3a/G3b group 2.9% vs CKD stage G4/G5 group 2.4%; P = .418). All-cause mortality resulted higher in the CKD stage G4/G5 group than in the NKF group (19.5% vs 9.8%; adjusted hazard ratio 1.9; 95% confidence interval 1.25–2.89; P = .003). LPM electrical performance was comparable between groups, except for patients with CKD who showed a slightly higher pacing threshold during 1-month follow-up (NKF group 0.50 V [IQR 0.35–0.70 V] vs G3a/G3b group 0.56 V [IQR 0.38–0.81 V] vs G4/G5 group 0.51 V [0.38–0.84 V] @ 0.24 ms; P < .001). Conclusion: In a real-world setting, patients with advanced CKD who underwent LPM implantation were underrepresented. Although all-cause mortality was higher in end-stage CKD, periprocedural complications and LPM performance were overall comparable between NKF and different stages of CKD, except for higher values of pacing threshold in patients with CKD up to first-month follow-up.
CIED; Chronic kidney disease; Leadless pacemaker; Micra; Renal function
Settore MEDS-07/B - Malattie dell'apparato cardiovascolare
2025
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
leadless.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 750.33 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
750.33 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1144957
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 5
  • OpenAlex 5
social impact