Background: The detection of in-stent restenosis (ISR) with coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is challenging, but CT perfusion (CTP) has demonstrated improved diagnostic accuracy over CCTA in patients with stents. However, there are limited data on the performance of dynamic CTP, which allows noninvasive adjudication of regional myocardial blood flow. Purpose: To compare the diagnostic performance of regadenoson-stress dynamic CTP with that of CCTA, using fractional flow reserve (FFR) and the index of microvascular resistance (IMR) as reference standards for epicardial coronary circulation and coronary microcirculation, respectively. Materials and Methods: Between January 2021 and June 2022, this prospective study enrolled patients with stents with indication for invasive coronary angiography due to suspicion of ISR or coronary artery disease progression. Participants underwent dynamic stress myocardial CTP and rest CTP plus CCTA. A wide coverage (z-axis coverage, 16 cm) and fast (gantry rotation time, 0.28 second) scanner was used. During invasive coronary angiography, FFR and IMR were obtained. The diagnostic rate (number of interpretable territories divided by number of evaluated territories) and accuracy of CCTA and CTP were evaluated in a territory-based analysis and compared with FFR and IMR (primary end points of the study). Results: The study included 156 consecutive patients (136 men [87%]; mean age, 63.1 years ± 8.2 [SD]) with 504 stents. The diagnostic rate was higher for CTP than for CCTA (98.7% [789 of 799 territories] vs 95.6% [764 of 799 territories], P < .001). With use of FFR as the reference standard, sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were higher for CTP than for CCTA (89.0%, 82.8%, and 84.7%, respectively, vs 60.0%, 61.9%, and 61.5%; P < .001). With use of IMR as the reference standard, sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were higher with CTP than with CCTA (76.5%, 85.9%, and 82.9%, respectively, vs 48.2%, 63.5%, and 59.3%; P < .01). The mean effective dose of stress CTP plus CCTA was 10.4 mSv ± 2.7. Conclusion: In patients with coronary stents, dynamic CTP improves the diagnostic performance of CCTA in the detection of territory-based ischemia.
Diagnostic Accuracy of Dynamic Stress Myocardial CT Perfusion Compared with Invasive Physiology in Patients with Stents: The Advantage 2 Study / D. Andreini, S. Mushtaq, D. Trabattoni, E. Conte, J. Sonck, G. Lorusso, S. Galli, G. Monizzi, M. Belmonte, L. Grancini, G. Teruzzi, S. Troiano, S. Gili, P. Montorsi, P. Olivares, V. Mallia, D. Marchetti, M. Schillaci, E. Gallinoro, P. Paolisso, C. Gigante, E. Melotti, A. Baggiano, M.E. Mancini, A. Annoni, A. Formenti, K. Sakai, T. Mizukami, G. Pontone, L. Zanotto, A.L. Bartorelli, C. Collet. - In: RADIOLOGY. - ISSN 1527-1315. - 313:3(2024 Dec), pp. e232225.1-e232225.15. [10.1148/radiol.232225]
Diagnostic Accuracy of Dynamic Stress Myocardial CT Perfusion Compared with Invasive Physiology in Patients with Stents: The Advantage 2 Study
D. Andreini
Co-primo
;S. MushtaqCo-primo
;E. Conte;G. Monizzi;M. Belmonte;S. Troiano;P. Montorsi;P. Olivares;V. Mallia;D. Marchetti;M. Schillaci;C. Gigante;E. Melotti;A. Baggiano;A. Formenti;G. Pontone;A.L. BartorelliCo-ultimo
;
2024
Abstract
Background: The detection of in-stent restenosis (ISR) with coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is challenging, but CT perfusion (CTP) has demonstrated improved diagnostic accuracy over CCTA in patients with stents. However, there are limited data on the performance of dynamic CTP, which allows noninvasive adjudication of regional myocardial blood flow. Purpose: To compare the diagnostic performance of regadenoson-stress dynamic CTP with that of CCTA, using fractional flow reserve (FFR) and the index of microvascular resistance (IMR) as reference standards for epicardial coronary circulation and coronary microcirculation, respectively. Materials and Methods: Between January 2021 and June 2022, this prospective study enrolled patients with stents with indication for invasive coronary angiography due to suspicion of ISR or coronary artery disease progression. Participants underwent dynamic stress myocardial CTP and rest CTP plus CCTA. A wide coverage (z-axis coverage, 16 cm) and fast (gantry rotation time, 0.28 second) scanner was used. During invasive coronary angiography, FFR and IMR were obtained. The diagnostic rate (number of interpretable territories divided by number of evaluated territories) and accuracy of CCTA and CTP were evaluated in a territory-based analysis and compared with FFR and IMR (primary end points of the study). Results: The study included 156 consecutive patients (136 men [87%]; mean age, 63.1 years ± 8.2 [SD]) with 504 stents. The diagnostic rate was higher for CTP than for CCTA (98.7% [789 of 799 territories] vs 95.6% [764 of 799 territories], P < .001). With use of FFR as the reference standard, sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were higher for CTP than for CCTA (89.0%, 82.8%, and 84.7%, respectively, vs 60.0%, 61.9%, and 61.5%; P < .001). With use of IMR as the reference standard, sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were higher with CTP than with CCTA (76.5%, 85.9%, and 82.9%, respectively, vs 48.2%, 63.5%, and 59.3%; P < .01). The mean effective dose of stress CTP plus CCTA was 10.4 mSv ± 2.7. Conclusion: In patients with coronary stents, dynamic CTP improves the diagnostic performance of CCTA in the detection of territory-based ischemia.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
2024 Radiology - (Diagnostic Accurcy of Dynamic Stress Myocardial CTP Compared with Invasive Physiology in Stents-Advantage 2).pdf
accesso riservato
Descrizione: Original Research
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione
2.16 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.16 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.