This work presents a new class of reaction automata, called Chemical Pure Reaction Automata (CPRA). CPRA combines characteristics of chemical reaction automata, as introduced by Okubo et al. in 2016, with those of the more recently defined reaction automata. Unlike standard chemical reaction automata, CPRA lack permanence, meaning their result states consist solely of the reaction products, with unconsumed reactants being discarded. We investigate the computational power of two CPRA variants, both working in a maximally parallel manner. We first prove that deterministic CPRA (DCPRA)—in which at every state, for each input symbol, the resulting state is the same for all multisets of enabled reactions—are not Turing complete. We then show that non-deterministic CPRA are Turing complete and thus strictly more powerful than DCPRA: namely, the set of languages accepted by CPRA in the maximally parallel manner contains the set of languages accepted by standard chemical reaction automata in the same manner.
Chemical pure reaction automata in maximally parallel manner / R. Ascone, G. Bernardini, F. Leiter, L. Manzoni. - In: JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE COMPUTING. - ISSN 2523-8906. - (2025 Jan 22). [Epub ahead of print] [10.1007/s41965-024-00176-7]
Chemical pure reaction automata in maximally parallel manner
G. BernardiniSecondo
;
2025
Abstract
This work presents a new class of reaction automata, called Chemical Pure Reaction Automata (CPRA). CPRA combines characteristics of chemical reaction automata, as introduced by Okubo et al. in 2016, with those of the more recently defined reaction automata. Unlike standard chemical reaction automata, CPRA lack permanence, meaning their result states consist solely of the reaction products, with unconsumed reactants being discarded. We investigate the computational power of two CPRA variants, both working in a maximally parallel manner. We first prove that deterministic CPRA (DCPRA)—in which at every state, for each input symbol, the resulting state is the same for all multisets of enabled reactions—are not Turing complete. We then show that non-deterministic CPRA are Turing complete and thus strictly more powerful than DCPRA: namely, the set of languages accepted by CPRA in the maximally parallel manner contains the set of languages accepted by standard chemical reaction automata in the same manner.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Ascone_et_al-2025-Journal_of_Membrane_Computing.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
1.83 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.83 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




