Background: Both docetaxel and androgen-receptor-axis-targeted (ARAT) agents are approved in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) patients. Predictive factors of therapy efficacy are lacking. Methods: We included articles reporting data about randomized-controlled clinical trials (RCTs) testing an ARAT agent plus ADT vs. ADT. We aimed to obtain pooled estimates of efficacy outcomes and assess differences in pooled estimates of efficacy outcomes between sub-groups. Results: A total of 5427 mCSPC patients enrolled in five RCTs were evaluable for OS (Overall Survival) and PFS (Progression-free survival). Pooled OS-HR (Hazard Ratio) was 0.66 (95 % CI: 0.60−0.74), while pooled PFS-HR was 0.46 (95 % CI: 0.40−0.53). Combined treatment with docetaxel was associated with differential OS outcomes, while tumor volume according to the CHAARTED criteria and visceral metastasis were associated with differential PFS outcomes. Conclusion: Our results add evidence that ARAT agents improve OS in mCSPC and discourage their combined use with docetaxel in this setting.

Predictors of efficacy of androgen-receptor-axis-targeted therapies in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis / C. Buonerba, M. Ferro, P. Dolce, F. Crocetto, A. Verde, G. Lucarelli, L. Scafuri, S. Facchini, A. Vaia, A. Marinelli, D. Terracciano, L. Montella, N. Longo, C. Imbimbo, V. Mirone, G. Di Lorenzo, S. De Placido, G. Sonpavde. - In: CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY. - ISSN 1040-8428. - 151:(2020 Jul), pp. 102992.1-102992.8. [10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.102992]

Predictors of efficacy of androgen-receptor-axis-targeted therapies in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

M. Ferro
Secondo
;
2020

Abstract

Background: Both docetaxel and androgen-receptor-axis-targeted (ARAT) agents are approved in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) patients. Predictive factors of therapy efficacy are lacking. Methods: We included articles reporting data about randomized-controlled clinical trials (RCTs) testing an ARAT agent plus ADT vs. ADT. We aimed to obtain pooled estimates of efficacy outcomes and assess differences in pooled estimates of efficacy outcomes between sub-groups. Results: A total of 5427 mCSPC patients enrolled in five RCTs were evaluable for OS (Overall Survival) and PFS (Progression-free survival). Pooled OS-HR (Hazard Ratio) was 0.66 (95 % CI: 0.60−0.74), while pooled PFS-HR was 0.46 (95 % CI: 0.40−0.53). Combined treatment with docetaxel was associated with differential OS outcomes, while tumor volume according to the CHAARTED criteria and visceral metastasis were associated with differential PFS outcomes. Conclusion: Our results add evidence that ARAT agents improve OS in mCSPC and discourage their combined use with docetaxel in this setting.
Abiraterone; Apalutamide; Castration-sensitive prostate cancer; Enzalutamide;
Settore MEDS-14/C - Urologia
lug-2020
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S104084282030130X-main.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 978.72 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
978.72 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1127428
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 36
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 36
social impact