Background: The role of kidney-sparing surgery in patients with high-risk upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma is controversial. The present study aimed to assess oncological and functional outcomes of robot-assisted distal ureterectomy in patients with high-risk distal ureteral tumors. MeThodS: The roBUUST 2.0 multicenter international (2015-2022) dataset was used for this retrospective cohort analysis. high-risk patients with distal ureteral tumors were divided based on type of surgery: robot-assisted distal ureterectomy or robot-assisted nephroureterectomy. a survival analysis was performed for local recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival. after adjusting for clinical features of the high-risk prognostic group, Cox proportional hazard model was plotted to evaluate significant predictors of time-to-event outcomes. reSUlTS: overall, 477 patients were retrieved, of which 58 received robot-assisted distal ureterectomy and 419 robot-assisted nephroureterectomy, respectively, with a mean (±Sd) follow-up of 29.6 months (±2.6). The two groups were comparable in terms of baseline features. At survival analysis, no significant difference was observed in terms of recurrence-free survival (p=0.6), metastasis-free survival (p=0.5) and overall survival (p=0.7) between robot-assisted distal ureterectomy and robot-assisted nephroureterectomy. At Cox regression analysis, type of surgery was never a significant predictor of worse oncological outcomes. at last follow-up patients undergoing robot-assisted distal ureterectomy had significantly better postoperative renal function. CoNClUSioNS: Comparable outcomes in terms of recurrence-free survival, metastasis-free survival, and overall survival between robot-assisted distal ureterectomy and robot-assisted nephroureterectomy patients, and better postoperative renal function preservation in the former group were observed. Kidney-sparing surgery should be considered as a potential option for selected patients with high-risk distal ureteral UTUC.
Robotic distal ureterectomy for high-risk distal ureteral urothelial carcinoma: a retrospective multicenter comparative analysis (roBUUST 2.0 collaborative group) / F. Ditonno, A. Franco, A. Veccia, E. Bologna, L. Wang, F. Abdollah, M. Finati, G. Simone, G. Tuderti, E. Helstrom, A. Correa, O. de Cobrlli, M. Ferro, F. Porpiglia, D. Amparore, A. Tufano, S. Perdona, R. Bhanvadia, V. Margulis, A. Bronimann, N. Singla, D. Puri, I.H. Derweesh, D.F. Mendiola, M.I. Gonzalgo, R. Ben-David, R. Mehrazin, S.C. Moon, S. Rais-Bahrami, C. Yong, F.S. Moghaddam, A. Ghoreifi, C.P. Sundaram, Z. Wu, H. Djaladat, A. Antonelli, R. Autorino. - In: MINERVA UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY. - ISSN 2724-6051. - 76:3(2024), pp. 331-339. [10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05737-9]
Robotic distal ureterectomy for high-risk distal ureteral urothelial carcinoma: a retrospective multicenter comparative analysis (roBUUST 2.0 collaborative group)
E. Bologna;G. Simone;M. Ferro;Z. Wu;
2024
Abstract
Background: The role of kidney-sparing surgery in patients with high-risk upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma is controversial. The present study aimed to assess oncological and functional outcomes of robot-assisted distal ureterectomy in patients with high-risk distal ureteral tumors. MeThodS: The roBUUST 2.0 multicenter international (2015-2022) dataset was used for this retrospective cohort analysis. high-risk patients with distal ureteral tumors were divided based on type of surgery: robot-assisted distal ureterectomy or robot-assisted nephroureterectomy. a survival analysis was performed for local recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival. after adjusting for clinical features of the high-risk prognostic group, Cox proportional hazard model was plotted to evaluate significant predictors of time-to-event outcomes. reSUlTS: overall, 477 patients were retrieved, of which 58 received robot-assisted distal ureterectomy and 419 robot-assisted nephroureterectomy, respectively, with a mean (±Sd) follow-up of 29.6 months (±2.6). The two groups were comparable in terms of baseline features. At survival analysis, no significant difference was observed in terms of recurrence-free survival (p=0.6), metastasis-free survival (p=0.5) and overall survival (p=0.7) between robot-assisted distal ureterectomy and robot-assisted nephroureterectomy. At Cox regression analysis, type of surgery was never a significant predictor of worse oncological outcomes. at last follow-up patients undergoing robot-assisted distal ureterectomy had significantly better postoperative renal function. CoNClUSioNS: Comparable outcomes in terms of recurrence-free survival, metastasis-free survival, and overall survival between robot-assisted distal ureterectomy and robot-assisted nephroureterectomy patients, and better postoperative renal function preservation in the former group were observed. Kidney-sparing surgery should be considered as a potential option for selected patients with high-risk distal ureteral UTUC.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
R19Y2024N03A0331.pdf
accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione
1.06 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.06 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




