Recent instrument advancements in the transient electromagnetic (TEM) method enable waterborne applications, as well as traditional ground-based surveys. We investigate a common framework to handle combined datasets from ground-based and waterborne TEM surveys under one model-domain. The modeling complexity increases for two main reasons: i) multidimensionality effects are unavoidable in data from settings with strong conductivity contrasts. ii) different systems have different sensitivity footprints, which is challenging to integrate into a common domain. We address these challenges using a previously developed 3D inversion scheme: First, octree-based forward modeling is used to describe the multi-dimensional environment for more accurate field simulations. Second, a decoupling between forward and inversion mesh offers the flexibility of modeling individual soundings to minimize computational costs, while allowing a commonly shared model-domain for the inversion. We validate the method through synthetic and field case studies. The synthetic studies show that: i) a careful forward mesh refinement is required for models with thin and highly conductive top layers. ii) compared to 3D forward responses, 1D modeling has an approximate 300% error directly over the coastline decreasing to a 10% error 50 m away. iii) the 3D inversion outperforms the 1D inversion by a lower data misfit and more accurate model reconstruction. The field case further underlines better consistency of 3D inversion, which delineates the lithological transition from sand to clay and is verified by a better agreement with existing borehole data. Based on these experiments, we conclude that i) 3D inversion is preferred over strong resistivity contrasts arising along a coastline; ii) careful mesh refinement and decoupling of the forward and inversion mesh is an efficient approach to handle computational challenges on forward while maintaining a common inversion mesh; iii) more focus on optimization is required to realize full-scale 3D inversion for integrated surveys in a coastal area.

3D inversion of an integrated ground-based and waterborne transient electromagnetic survey / L. Xiao, G. Fiandaca, P.K. Maurya, A. Vest Christiansen. - In: GEOPHYSICS. - ISSN 0016-8033. - 88:5(2023 Sep 01), pp. B221-B231. [10.1190/geo2022-0318.1]

3D inversion of an integrated ground-based and waterborne transient electromagnetic survey

G. Fiandaca
Secondo
;
2023

Abstract

Recent instrument advancements in the transient electromagnetic (TEM) method enable waterborne applications, as well as traditional ground-based surveys. We investigate a common framework to handle combined datasets from ground-based and waterborne TEM surveys under one model-domain. The modeling complexity increases for two main reasons: i) multidimensionality effects are unavoidable in data from settings with strong conductivity contrasts. ii) different systems have different sensitivity footprints, which is challenging to integrate into a common domain. We address these challenges using a previously developed 3D inversion scheme: First, octree-based forward modeling is used to describe the multi-dimensional environment for more accurate field simulations. Second, a decoupling between forward and inversion mesh offers the flexibility of modeling individual soundings to minimize computational costs, while allowing a commonly shared model-domain for the inversion. We validate the method through synthetic and field case studies. The synthetic studies show that: i) a careful forward mesh refinement is required for models with thin and highly conductive top layers. ii) compared to 3D forward responses, 1D modeling has an approximate 300% error directly over the coastline decreasing to a 10% error 50 m away. iii) the 3D inversion outperforms the 1D inversion by a lower data misfit and more accurate model reconstruction. The field case further underlines better consistency of 3D inversion, which delineates the lithological transition from sand to clay and is verified by a better agreement with existing borehole data. Based on these experiments, we conclude that i) 3D inversion is preferred over strong resistivity contrasts arising along a coastline; ii) careful mesh refinement and decoupling of the forward and inversion mesh is an efficient approach to handle computational challenges on forward while maintaining a common inversion mesh; iii) more focus on optimization is required to realize full-scale 3D inversion for integrated surveys in a coastal area.
Settore GEOS-04/B - Geofisica applicata
1-set-2023
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1118688
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact