PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the mechanical external work (per kg) and pendular energy transduction at preferred walking speed (PWS) in obese versus normal body mass subjects to investigate whether obese adults adopt energy conserving gait mechanics. METHODS: The mechanical external work (W ext) and the fraction of mechanical energy recovered by the pendular mechanism (Rstep) were computed using kinematic data acquired by an optoelectronic system and were compared in 30 obese (OG; body mass index [BMI] = 39.6 ± 0.6 kg•m-2; 29.5 ± 1.3 yr) and 19 normal body mass adults (NG; BMI = 21.4 ± 0.5 kg•m-2; 31.2 ± 1.2 yr) walking at PWS. RESULTS: PWS was significantly lower in OG (1.18 ± 0.02 m•s-1) than in NG (1.33 ± 0.02 m•s-1; P = 0.001). There was no significant difference in Wext per unit mass between groups (OG: 0.36 ± 0.03 J•kg -1•m-1; NG: 0.31 ± 0.02 J•kg -1•m-1; P = 0.12). Rstep was significantly lower in OG (68.4% ± 2.0%) compared with NG (74.4% ± 1.0%; P = 0.01). In OG only, Wext per unit mass was positively correlated with PWS (r = 0.57; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Obese adults do not appear to alter their gait to improve pendular energy transduction and may select slower PWS to reduce mechanical and metabolic work.
Mechanical External Work and Recovery at Preferred Walking Speed in Obese Subjects / D. Malatesta, L. Vismara, F. Menegoni, M. Galli, M. Romei, P. Capodaglio. - In: MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE. - ISSN 0195-9131. - 41:2(2009), pp. 426-434. [10.1249/MSS.0b013e31818606e7]
Mechanical External Work and Recovery at Preferred Walking Speed in Obese Subjects
P. CapodaglioUltimo
2009
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the mechanical external work (per kg) and pendular energy transduction at preferred walking speed (PWS) in obese versus normal body mass subjects to investigate whether obese adults adopt energy conserving gait mechanics. METHODS: The mechanical external work (W ext) and the fraction of mechanical energy recovered by the pendular mechanism (Rstep) were computed using kinematic data acquired by an optoelectronic system and were compared in 30 obese (OG; body mass index [BMI] = 39.6 ± 0.6 kg•m-2; 29.5 ± 1.3 yr) and 19 normal body mass adults (NG; BMI = 21.4 ± 0.5 kg•m-2; 31.2 ± 1.2 yr) walking at PWS. RESULTS: PWS was significantly lower in OG (1.18 ± 0.02 m•s-1) than in NG (1.33 ± 0.02 m•s-1; P = 0.001). There was no significant difference in Wext per unit mass between groups (OG: 0.36 ± 0.03 J•kg -1•m-1; NG: 0.31 ± 0.02 J•kg -1•m-1; P = 0.12). Rstep was significantly lower in OG (68.4% ± 2.0%) compared with NG (74.4% ± 1.0%; P = 0.01). In OG only, Wext per unit mass was positively correlated with PWS (r = 0.57; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Obese adults do not appear to alter their gait to improve pendular energy transduction and may select slower PWS to reduce mechanical and metabolic work.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
MalatestaMSSE2009Wext_PWS_Obeses.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione
286.63 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
286.63 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




