The ability of the relaxed eddy accumulation (REA) method to estimate the kinematic fluxes of temperature, water vapor and carbon dioxide was assessed for the dry season (3 months) at the ATTO (Amazon Tall Tower Observatory) site from turbulence measurements. The measurements were performed at 50 m above ground within the roughness sublayer. Non-conformity with inertial sublayer conditions was confirmed one more time by analyzing dimensionless scalar standard deviations. Over the scale of the whole dry season, REA and EC (eddy covariance) estimates are essentially equal. Recently found results that the REA method outperforms Monin-Obukhov-based approaches are confirmed. However, we also verify that such results fail to reveal significant variability and scatter of the REA estimates when the fluxes are of small magnitude. On the basis of previous studies, we conjecture that this is caused by a likely imbalance between scalar gradient production and molecular dissipation. Confirmation of our results to trace gases, therefore, requires further study.

The Relaxed Eddy Accumulation Method Over the Amazon Forest: The Importance of Flux Strength on Individual and Aggregated Flux Estimates / N.L. Dias, I.M.C. Toro, C.Q. Dias-Júnior, L. Mortarini, D. Brondani. - In: BOUNDARY-LAYER METEOROLOGY. - ISSN 0006-8314. - 189:1-3(2023 Dec), pp. 139-161. [10.1007/s10546-023-00829-7]

The Relaxed Eddy Accumulation Method Over the Amazon Forest: The Importance of Flux Strength on Individual and Aggregated Flux Estimates

L. Mortarini
Penultimo
Conceptualization
;
2023

Abstract

The ability of the relaxed eddy accumulation (REA) method to estimate the kinematic fluxes of temperature, water vapor and carbon dioxide was assessed for the dry season (3 months) at the ATTO (Amazon Tall Tower Observatory) site from turbulence measurements. The measurements were performed at 50 m above ground within the roughness sublayer. Non-conformity with inertial sublayer conditions was confirmed one more time by analyzing dimensionless scalar standard deviations. Over the scale of the whole dry season, REA and EC (eddy covariance) estimates are essentially equal. Recently found results that the REA method outperforms Monin-Obukhov-based approaches are confirmed. However, we also verify that such results fail to reveal significant variability and scatter of the REA estimates when the fluxes are of small magnitude. On the basis of previous studies, we conjecture that this is caused by a likely imbalance between scalar gradient production and molecular dissipation. Confirmation of our results to trace gases, therefore, requires further study.
Roughness sublayer; ATTO project; REA method
Settore PHYS-05/B - Fisica del sistema Terra, dei pianeti, dello spazio e del clima
Settore PHYS-06/A - Fisica per le scienze della vita, l'ambiente e i beni culturali
Settore GEOS-04/C - Oceanografia, meteorologia e climatologia
dic-2023
4-ott-2023
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
69_Dias_et_al_2023_BLM.pdf

accesso riservato

Descrizione: online first
Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 4.24 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.24 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
s10546-023-00829-7.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 4.23 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.23 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
v1_covered_fb2aee4f-d417-4652-ac7e-bbaea00c2b15.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Pre-print (manoscritto inviato all'editore)
Dimensione 4.3 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.3 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1117850
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact