The total net metabolic power output (E, kW) required to scull a traditional, flat hull boat--the "Bissa", 9.02 m long and weighting about 500 kg including the crew-was assessed at different constant speeds (nu) ranging from 2.44 to 3.75 m s(-1). E increased with the speed: E = 0.417 x e (0.664v ); r (2) = 0.931. The amount of metabolic energy spent per unit distance (C, J m(-1)) to move the "Bissa", calculated by dividing E by the corresponding nu, was a linear function of nu: C = 0.369 nu -0.063; r (2) = 0.821. The hydrodynamic resistance met by the boat in the water--drag (D, N)--was estimated by analysing the decay of the reciprocal of nu as a function of time measured during several spontaneous deceleration tests carried out in still water and by knowing the total mass of the watercraft plus crew. D increased as a square function of speed: D = 12.76 v (2). This allowed us to calculate the drag efficiency (g(d)), as the ratio of D to C: g(d) increased from 8.9 to 13.7% in the range of the speeds tested. The "Bissa" turned out to be as economical as other flat hull, traditional watercrafts, such as the bigger Venetian gondola, and her g(d) was similar to that of other modern and traditional watercrafts.

Energy cost and efficiency of Venetian rowing on a traditional, flat hull boat (Bissa) / C. Capelli, C. Tarperi, F. Schena, A. Cevese. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY. - ISSN 1439-6319. - 105:4(2009), pp. 653-661. [10.1007/s00421-008-0949-6]

Energy cost and efficiency of Venetian rowing on a traditional, flat hull boat (Bissa)

C. Capelli
Primo
;
F. Schena;
2009

Abstract

The total net metabolic power output (E, kW) required to scull a traditional, flat hull boat--the "Bissa", 9.02 m long and weighting about 500 kg including the crew-was assessed at different constant speeds (nu) ranging from 2.44 to 3.75 m s(-1). E increased with the speed: E = 0.417 x e (0.664v ); r (2) = 0.931. The amount of metabolic energy spent per unit distance (C, J m(-1)) to move the "Bissa", calculated by dividing E by the corresponding nu, was a linear function of nu: C = 0.369 nu -0.063; r (2) = 0.821. The hydrodynamic resistance met by the boat in the water--drag (D, N)--was estimated by analysing the decay of the reciprocal of nu as a function of time measured during several spontaneous deceleration tests carried out in still water and by knowing the total mass of the watercraft plus crew. D increased as a square function of speed: D = 12.76 v (2). This allowed us to calculate the drag efficiency (g(d)), as the ratio of D to C: g(d) increased from 8.9 to 13.7% in the range of the speeds tested. The "Bissa" turned out to be as economical as other flat hull, traditional watercrafts, such as the bigger Venetian gondola, and her g(d) was similar to that of other modern and traditional watercrafts.
energy cost of rowing; water drag; efficiency; Venetian rowing
Settore BIOS-06/A - Fisiologia
2009
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Capelli_et_al_2009a.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 272.35 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
272.35 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1117634
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 8
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact