Purpose: The aim of this study was to systematically review the use of automated detection systems for identifying bone lesions based on CT and MRI, focusing on advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) applications. Materials and methods: A literature search was conducted on PubMed and MEDLINE. Data were extracted and grouped into three main categories, namely baseline study characteristics, model validation strategies, and the type of AI algorithms. Results: A total of 10 studies were selected and analyzed, including 2,768 patients overall with a median of 187 per study. These studies utilized various AI algorithms, predominantly deep learning models (6 studies) such as Convolutional Neural Networks. Among machine learning validation strategies, K-fold cross-validation was the mostly used (5 studies). Clinical validation was performed using data from the same institution (internal testing) in 8 studies and from both the same and different (external testing) institutions in 1 study, respectively. Conclusion: AI, particularly deep learning, holds significant promise in enhancing diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. However, the review highlights several limitations, such as the lack of standardized validation methods and the limited use of external datasets for testing. Future research should address these gaps to ensure the reliability and applicability of AI-based detection systems in clinical settings.
Automated detection of bone lesions using CT and MRI: a systematic review / F. Erdem, S. Gitto, S. Fusco, M.V. Bausano, F. Serpi, D. Albano, C. Messina, L.M. Sconfienza. - In: LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA. - ISSN 1826-6983. - (2024), pp. 1-8. [Epub ahead of print] [10.1007/s11547-024-01913-9]
Automated detection of bone lesions using CT and MRI: a systematic review
S. GittoSecondo
;S. Fusco;M.V. Bausano;F. Serpi;D. Albano;C. MessinaPenultimo
;L.M. Sconfienza
Ultimo
2024
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to systematically review the use of automated detection systems for identifying bone lesions based on CT and MRI, focusing on advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) applications. Materials and methods: A literature search was conducted on PubMed and MEDLINE. Data were extracted and grouped into three main categories, namely baseline study characteristics, model validation strategies, and the type of AI algorithms. Results: A total of 10 studies were selected and analyzed, including 2,768 patients overall with a median of 187 per study. These studies utilized various AI algorithms, predominantly deep learning models (6 studies) such as Convolutional Neural Networks. Among machine learning validation strategies, K-fold cross-validation was the mostly used (5 studies). Clinical validation was performed using data from the same institution (internal testing) in 8 studies and from both the same and different (external testing) institutions in 1 study, respectively. Conclusion: AI, particularly deep learning, holds significant promise in enhancing diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. However, the review highlights several limitations, such as the lack of standardized validation methods and the limited use of external datasets for testing. Future research should address these gaps to ensure the reliability and applicability of AI-based detection systems in clinical settings.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
b69fdb78-58bb-4ca8-8841-525aaf5166a4.pdf
accesso riservato
Descrizione: Article
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione
574.18 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
574.18 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.