This contribution is devoted to the topic of compliance in the legalregulatory context, focusing on the need for new epistemologies of compliance that look at different, and interoperable, contexts. It is an attempt to understand and explain human and non-human cognitive processes at the basis of evaluations of a knowledge (and knowing) compliant capacity with the tension to reconstruct the different phases of the intelligibility of dispositions (and target documents that derive from them). The data analyzed so far allow us to imagine new (and plural) epistemic foundations capable of understanding and explaining this complexity. In particular, it seems to be possible to support a transition (linguistic, modeling, but also operational) from ontologies to epistemologies, all the more so when we are called upon to evaluate the issue of compliance.

Resignifying Compliance Between Ontologies and Epistemologies of Law (Invited Paper) / M. Buffa (LECTURE NOTES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE). - In: Advances in Conceptual Modeling : ER 2024 Workshops, AISA, CMLS, EmpER, QUAMES, JUSMOD, LLM4Modeling, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, October 28–31, 2024, Proceedings / [a cura di] M. Saeki, L. Wong, J. Araujo, C. Ayora, A. Bernasconi, M. Buffa, S. Castano, P. Fettke, H. G. Fill, et al.. - Prima edizione. - Heidelberg : Springer, 2024 Oct 08. - ISBN 9783031755989. - pp. 253-266 (( Intervento presentato al 43. convegno International Conference on Conceptual Modeling tenutosi a Pittsburgh nel 2024 [10.1007/978-3-031-75599-6_19].

Resignifying Compliance Between Ontologies and Epistemologies of Law (Invited Paper)

M. Buffa
2024

Abstract

This contribution is devoted to the topic of compliance in the legalregulatory context, focusing on the need for new epistemologies of compliance that look at different, and interoperable, contexts. It is an attempt to understand and explain human and non-human cognitive processes at the basis of evaluations of a knowledge (and knowing) compliant capacity with the tension to reconstruct the different phases of the intelligibility of dispositions (and target documents that derive from them). The data analyzed so far allow us to imagine new (and plural) epistemic foundations capable of understanding and explaining this complexity. In particular, it seems to be possible to support a transition (linguistic, modeling, but also operational) from ontologies to epistemologies, all the more so when we are called upon to evaluate the issue of compliance.
Compliance; Ontologies; Epistemologies; Philosophy of Law; GDPR
Settore GSPS-07/B - Sociologia del diritto e della devianza
Settore GIUR-17/A - Filosofia del diritto
   SEcurity and RIghts in the CyberSpace (SERICS)
   SERICS
   MINISTERO DELL'UNIVERSITA' E DELLA RICERCA
   codice identificativo PE00000014
8-ott-2024
Carnagie Mellon University
Book Part (author)
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1116581
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact