Purpose: This retrospective study examined the histomorphometrical outcomes resulting from managing Schneiderian membrane perforation during maxillary sinus floor augmentation using two different approaches and relating the results to perforation size. Methods: 19 subjects (7 males, 12 females, mean age 53.3±10.5 years), who experienced a sinus membrane perforation during lateral sinus lift procedure, were enrolled. Perforations were addressed utilizing either the "Sinus Pack" technique (test group, 11 subjects) or collagen membranes with absorbable sutures (control group, 8 subjects). The "Sinus Pack" consisted of a combination of collagenated porcine bone, polyunsaturated fatty acids, and a biocompatible synthetic copolymer, wrapped in a resorbable porcine mesenchymal collagen membrane. Histomorphometry outcomes of both techniques were compared. Results: The percentage of vital bone was significantly higher with the "Sinus Pack" approach (44.5% ± 19.8%) compared to the control group (26.3% ± 21.2%) (P= 0.045). Clinical significance: The "Sinus Pack" approach for managing sinus membrane perforations appears to be effective and advantageous, as it has resulted in optimal histomorphometric outcomes, indicating a significant increase in vital bone.
A novel approach to manage Schneiderian membrane perforation in the maxillary sinus floor augmentation: The "Sinus Pack" technique. Histomorphometric analysis. Part 2/3 / P.C. Passarelli, M.A. Lopez, A. Netti, P. Wychowański, M. Del Fabbro, M. Chiapasco, A. D'Addona. - In: AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY. - ISSN 0894-8275. - 37:SIA(2024 Sep 01), pp. 18-20.
A novel approach to manage Schneiderian membrane perforation in the maxillary sinus floor augmentation: The "Sinus Pack" technique. Histomorphometric analysis. Part 2/3
M. Del Fabbro;M. ChiapascoPenultimo
;
2024
Abstract
Purpose: This retrospective study examined the histomorphometrical outcomes resulting from managing Schneiderian membrane perforation during maxillary sinus floor augmentation using two different approaches and relating the results to perforation size. Methods: 19 subjects (7 males, 12 females, mean age 53.3±10.5 years), who experienced a sinus membrane perforation during lateral sinus lift procedure, were enrolled. Perforations were addressed utilizing either the "Sinus Pack" technique (test group, 11 subjects) or collagen membranes with absorbable sutures (control group, 8 subjects). The "Sinus Pack" consisted of a combination of collagenated porcine bone, polyunsaturated fatty acids, and a biocompatible synthetic copolymer, wrapped in a resorbable porcine mesenchymal collagen membrane. Histomorphometry outcomes of both techniques were compared. Results: The percentage of vital bone was significantly higher with the "Sinus Pack" approach (44.5% ± 19.8%) compared to the control group (26.3% ± 21.2%) (P= 0.045). Clinical significance: The "Sinus Pack" approach for managing sinus membrane perforations appears to be effective and advantageous, as it has resulted in optimal histomorphometric outcomes, indicating a significant increase in vital bone.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
AJOD_spec2024_Passarelli+pp18-20(2).pdf
accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione
716.95 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
716.95 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.