Comparative efficacy of THR-β agonists, FGF-21 analogues, GLP-1R agonists, GLP-1-based polyagonists, and Pan-PPAR agonists for MASLD: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Aims: To compare the efficacy of thyroid hormone receptor beta (THR-β) agonists, fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF-21) analogues, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), GLP-1-based polyagonists, and pan-peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (Pan-PPAR) agonists in the treatment of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). Methods: A database search for relevant randomized double-blind controlled trials published until July 11, 2024, was conducted. Primary outcomes were the relative change in hepatic fat fraction (HFF) and liver stiffness assessed non-invasively by magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction and elastography. Secondary outcomes included histology, liver injury index, lipid profile, glucose metabolism, blood pressure, and body weight. Results: Twenty-seven trials (5357 patients with MASLD) were identified. For HFF reduction, GLP-1-based polyagonists were most potentially effective (mean difference [MD] −51.47; 95 % confidence interval [CI]: −68.25 to −34.68; surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] 84.9) vs. placebo, followed by FGF-21 analogues (MD −47.08; 95 % CI: −58.83 to −35.34; SUCRA 75.5), GLP-1R agonists (MD −37.36; 95 % CI: −69.52 to −5.21; SUCRA 52.3) and THR-β agonists (MD −33.20; 95 % CI: −43.90 to −22.51; SUCRA 36.9). For liver stiffness, FGF-21 analogues were most potentially effective (MD −9.65; 95 % CI: −19.28 to −0.01; SUCRA 82.2) vs. placebo, followed by THR-β agonists (MD −5.79; 95 % CI: −9.50 to −2.09; SUCRA 58.2), and GLP-1RAs (MD −5.58; 95 % CI: −15.02 to 3.86; SUCRA 54.7). For fibrosis improvement in histology, GLP-1-based polyagonists were most potentially effective, followed by FGF-21 analogues, THR-β agonists, Pan-PPAR agonists, and GLP-1R agonists; For MASH resolution in histology, GLP-1-based polyagonists were most potentially effective, followed by THR-β agonists, GLP-1R agonists, FGF-21 analogues, and Pan-PPAR agonists. THR-β agonists are well-balanced in liver steatosis and fibrosis, and excel at improving lipid profiles; FGF-21 analogues are effective at improving steatosis and particularly exhibit strong antifibrotic abilities. GLP-1R agonists showed significant benefits in improving liver steatosis, glucose metabolism, and body weight. GLP-1-based polyagonists have demonstrated the most potential efficacy overall in terms of comprehensive curative effect. Pan-PPAR agonists showed distinct advantages in improving liver function and glucose metabolism. Conclusion: These results illustrate the relative superiority of the five classes of therapy in the treatment of MASLD and may serve as guidance for the development of combination therapies.