Purpose: Opening intensive care units (ICUs) is particularly relevant because of a new Swiss law granting the relatives of patients without decision-making capability a central role in medical decisions. The main objectives of the study were to assess how the presence of relatives is viewed by patients, health care providers, and relatives themselves and to evaluate the perception of the level of intrusiveness into the personal sphere during admission. Material and methods: In a longitudinal and prospective design, qualitative questionnaires were submitted concomitantly to patients, relatives, and health care providers consecutively over a 6-month period. The study was conducted in the 4 ICUs of the public hospitals of Canton Ticino (Switzerland). Results: The questionnaires collected from patients, relatives, and health care providers were 176, 173, and 134, respectively. The analysis of the answers of 120 patient-relative pairs showed consistent results (P < .0001), whereas those of health care providers were significantly different (P < .0001), regarding both the usefulness of opening ICUs to patient relatives and what was stressful during admission. Conclusions: Relatives in these "open" ICUs share a great deal of intimacy with the patients. Their presence and the deriving benefits were seen as very positive by patients and relatives themselves. Skepticism, instead, prevailed among health care providers.

Sharing intimacy in "open" Intensive Care Units: relatives and healthcare providers as representatives of patients in Southern Switzerland / V. Di Bernardo, N. Grignoli, C. Marazia, J. Andreotti, A. Perren, R. Malacrida. - In: CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE. - ISSN 0090-3493. - 30:5(2015 Oct), pp. 866-870. [10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.05.016]

Sharing intimacy in "open" Intensive Care Units: relatives and healthcare providers as representatives of patients in Southern Switzerland

C. Marazia;
2015

Abstract

Purpose: Opening intensive care units (ICUs) is particularly relevant because of a new Swiss law granting the relatives of patients without decision-making capability a central role in medical decisions. The main objectives of the study were to assess how the presence of relatives is viewed by patients, health care providers, and relatives themselves and to evaluate the perception of the level of intrusiveness into the personal sphere during admission. Material and methods: In a longitudinal and prospective design, qualitative questionnaires were submitted concomitantly to patients, relatives, and health care providers consecutively over a 6-month period. The study was conducted in the 4 ICUs of the public hospitals of Canton Ticino (Switzerland). Results: The questionnaires collected from patients, relatives, and health care providers were 176, 173, and 134, respectively. The analysis of the answers of 120 patient-relative pairs showed consistent results (P < .0001), whereas those of health care providers were significantly different (P < .0001), regarding both the usefulness of opening ICUs to patient relatives and what was stressful during admission. Conclusions: Relatives in these "open" ICUs share a great deal of intimacy with the patients. Their presence and the deriving benefits were seen as very positive by patients and relatives themselves. Skepticism, instead, prevailed among health care providers.
Critical care; Ethics; ICU visiting policy; Intensive care; Psychology; Surrogate decision making;
Settore MED/02 - Storia della Medicina
ott-2015
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
DiBernardo_Grignoli_Maraziaetal_SharingintimacyinopenICUs_Journal_of_critical_care2015.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 414.78 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
414.78 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1095603
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 5
  • Scopus 9
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact