Objectives: The administration of antibacterial agents should be optimized on the basis of their distribution to enhance drug exposure and obtain bacterial eradication. This study examines the pharmacokinetics of azithromycin in plasma, lung tissue and bronchial washing in patients after oral administration of 500 mg versus 1000 mg once daily for 3 days. Patients and methods: Samples of plasma, lung tissue and bronchial washing were obtained from a cohort of 48 patients during open-chest surgery for lung resection up to 204 h after the last drug dose, and assayed for antibiotic concentrations. Results: Azithromycin was widely distributed within the lower respiratory tract and sustained levels of the drug were detectable at the last sampling time in lung tissue. Doubling the dose of the antibiotic resulted in a proportional increase in lung area under the curve (AUC, 1245.4 versus 2514.2 h × mg/kg) and peak tissue concentration (Cmax, 8.93 ± 2.05 versus 18.6 ± 2.20 mg/kg). The pharmacodynamic parameter AUC/MIC for susceptible and intermediate strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae (MICs 0.5 and 2 mg/L, respectively) increased after administration of the 1000 mg schedule compared with 500 mg (AUC/MIC0.5 2414 versus 1144 and AUC/MIC2 2112 versus 814.1 h × mg/kg, respectively) in pulmonary tissue. Conclusions: Lung exposure to azithromycin is increased proportionally by doubling the dose, which results in a predictable pharmacokinetic behaviour of the drug in the lower respiratory tract.

Comparative distribution of azithromycin in lung tissue of patients given oral daily doses of 500 and 1000 mg / R. Danesi, A. Lupetti, C. Barbara, E. Ghelardi, A. Chella, T. Malizia, S. Senesi, C. Angeletti, M. DEL TACCA, M. Campa. - In: JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY. - ISSN 0305-7453. - 51:4(2003 Apr), pp. 939-945. [10.1093/jac/dkg138]

Comparative distribution of azithromycin in lung tissue of patients given oral daily doses of 500 and 1000 mg

R. Danesi
Primo
;
2003

Abstract

Objectives: The administration of antibacterial agents should be optimized on the basis of their distribution to enhance drug exposure and obtain bacterial eradication. This study examines the pharmacokinetics of azithromycin in plasma, lung tissue and bronchial washing in patients after oral administration of 500 mg versus 1000 mg once daily for 3 days. Patients and methods: Samples of plasma, lung tissue and bronchial washing were obtained from a cohort of 48 patients during open-chest surgery for lung resection up to 204 h after the last drug dose, and assayed for antibiotic concentrations. Results: Azithromycin was widely distributed within the lower respiratory tract and sustained levels of the drug were detectable at the last sampling time in lung tissue. Doubling the dose of the antibiotic resulted in a proportional increase in lung area under the curve (AUC, 1245.4 versus 2514.2 h × mg/kg) and peak tissue concentration (Cmax, 8.93 ± 2.05 versus 18.6 ± 2.20 mg/kg). The pharmacodynamic parameter AUC/MIC for susceptible and intermediate strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae (MICs 0.5 and 2 mg/L, respectively) increased after administration of the 1000 mg schedule compared with 500 mg (AUC/MIC0.5 2414 versus 1144 and AUC/MIC2 2112 versus 814.1 h × mg/kg, respectively) in pulmonary tissue. Conclusions: Lung exposure to azithromycin is increased proportionally by doubling the dose, which results in a predictable pharmacokinetic behaviour of the drug in the lower respiratory tract.
Azalide; Microbiological assay; Pharmacodynamics; Pharmacokinetics; Streptococcus pneumoniae
Settore BIO/14 - Farmacologia
apr-2003
1-apr-2003
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
dkg138.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 247.71 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
247.71 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1092649
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 24
  • Scopus 48
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 46
social impact