Deep learning-based pseudo-CT synthesis from zero echo time MR sequences of the pelvis

Objectives: To generate pseudo-CT (pCT) images of the pelvis from zero echo time (ZTE) MR sequences and compare them to conventional CT. Methods: Ninety-one patients were prospectively scanned with CT and MRI including ZTE sequences of the pelvis. Eleven ZTE image volumes were excluded due to implants and severe B1 field inhomogeneity. Out of the 80 data sets, 60 were used to train and update a deep learning (DL) model for pCT image synthesis from ZTE sequences while the remaining 20 cases were selected as an evaluation cohort. CT and pCT images were assessed qualitatively and quantitatively by two readers. Results: Mean pCT ratings of qualitative parameters were good to perfect (2-3 on a 4-point scale). Overall intermodality agreement between CT and pCT was good (ICC = 0.88 (95% CI: 0.85-0.90); p < 0.001) with excellent interreader agreements for pCT (ICC = 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88-0.93); p < 0.001). Most geometrical measurements did not show any significant difference between CT and pCT measurements (p > 0.05) with the exception of transverse pelvic diameter measurements and lateral center-edge angle measurements (p = 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). Image quality and tissue differentiation in CT and pCT were similar without significant differences between CT and pCT CNRs (all p > 0.05). Conclusions: Using a DL-based algorithm, it is possible to synthesize pCT images of the pelvis from ZTE sequences. The pCT images showed high bone depiction quality and accurate geometrical measurements compared to conventional CT. CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: pCT images generated from MR sequences allow for high accuracy in evaluating bone without the need for radiation exposure. Radiological applications are broad and include assessment of inflammatory and degenerative bone disease or preoperative planning studies. Key points: pCT, based on DL-reconstructed ZTE MR images, may be comparable with true CT images. Overall, the intermodality agreement between CT and pCT was good with excellent interreader agreements for pCT. Geometrical measurements and tissue differentiation were similar in CT and pCT images.