The article aims to analyse the uses of judicial precedents that go beyond the narrower and classical view, i.e. where a precedent such as the ratio decidendi is used as a normative basis for a later case. The study analyses a variety of other jurisprudential usages that are widespread in many legal systems, both common law and civil law. Each of them proves to be of general value and highlights some philosophically significant aspects of existing legal systems. The study thus shows that the uses of precedent associated with the analogy a pari/ simili and a fortiori and with the principle of authority are not the only ones and that the link between analogy and authority and the reasons for using precedent are contingent.

Los precedentes como batería de argumentos jurídicos : Un ejercicio de desencanto más allá de la analogía y la autoridad = Precedents as a set of legal arguments : An exercise of disenchantment beyond analogy and authority / S. Zorzetto. - In: BOLETÍN MEXICANO DE DERECHO COMPARADO. - ISSN 2448-4873. - 56:168(2024), pp. 277-322. [10.22201/iij.24484873e.2023.168.18867]

Los precedentes como batería de argumentos jurídicos : Un ejercicio de desencanto más allá de la analogía y la autoridad = Precedents as a set of legal arguments : An exercise of disenchantment beyond analogy and authority

S. Zorzetto
2024

Abstract

The article aims to analyse the uses of judicial precedents that go beyond the narrower and classical view, i.e. where a precedent such as the ratio decidendi is used as a normative basis for a later case. The study analyses a variety of other jurisprudential usages that are widespread in many legal systems, both common law and civil law. Each of them proves to be of general value and highlights some philosophically significant aspects of existing legal systems. The study thus shows that the uses of precedent associated with the analogy a pari/ simili and a fortiori and with the principle of authority are not the only ones and that the link between analogy and authority and the reasons for using precedent are contingent.
El artículo se propone examinar, en el marco de un análisis metajurisprudencial, los usos de los precedentes que van más allá de la mera concepción más estrecha y clásica, es decir, en la que un precedente como ratio decidendi se aplica como base normativa de un caso posterior. El estudio analiza una pluralidad de otros usos jurisprudenciales que están difundidos en muchos ordenamientos jurídicos tanto en el common law como en el civil law. Cada uno de ellos se hace notar en cuanto tiene valor general y muestra algunos aspectos filosóficamente destacados de los derechos vigentes. El estudio muestra, por tanto, que los usos de los precedentes vinculados a la analogía a pari/simili y a fortiori así como al principio de autoridad no son los únicos, y que el vínculo analogía/autoridad y las razones por las que se utilizan los precedentes son contingentes.
case law precedent; legal arguments; analogy; authority; precedentes judiciales; argumentos jurídicos; analogía; autoridad
Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia del Diritto
Settore GIUR-17/A - Filosofia del diritto
2024
https://revistas.juridicas.unam.mx/index.php/derecho-comparado/article/view/18867
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
BMEX Precedentes.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 383.25 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
383.25 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1089128
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact