Agricultural landscapes are currently suffering and generating severe ecological issues. This is especially true in intensively managed alluvial contexts, where biodiversity is declining and ecosystem services (ES) delivery capacity is being depleted. The aim of our study is to set up and test a synthetic analytical methodology that allows us to: understand current agricultural landscape ecological quality drivers (structural and functional traits); identify context-specific strategies to correct current negative trends (landscape ecology design approach); and assess the changes in the landscape ecological behavior provided by design scenarios. The applied methodology is low-cost and low-time-demanding and is based on multi-scale landscape ecology and land-use-based ES assessment; it implements a pattern-process-design approach. Analyses are applied to four northern Italian alluvial agricultural landscape systems. We specifically address landscape biodiversity support functions (landscape ecology indicators) and landscape multifunctionality (ES spatial assessment). We test the agroforestry approach (landscape feature insertions and crop diversification) as a key strategy to enhance ecological quality and ES, and we account for its contributions to context-specific design scenarios. This analytical toolkit might serve for future applications on similar case studies.

Agricultural Landscapes : A Pattern-Process-Design Approach to Enhance Their Ecological Quality and Ecosystem Services through Agroforestry / I. Vagge, N. Sgalippa, G. Chiaffarelli. - In: DIVERSITY. - ISSN 1424-2818. - 16:7(2024 Jul 22), pp. 431.1-431.26. [10.3390/d16070431]

Agricultural Landscapes : A Pattern-Process-Design Approach to Enhance Their Ecological Quality and Ecosystem Services through Agroforestry

I. Vagge
Primo
;
N. Sgalippa
Secondo
;
G. Chiaffarelli
Ultimo
2024

Abstract

Agricultural landscapes are currently suffering and generating severe ecological issues. This is especially true in intensively managed alluvial contexts, where biodiversity is declining and ecosystem services (ES) delivery capacity is being depleted. The aim of our study is to set up and test a synthetic analytical methodology that allows us to: understand current agricultural landscape ecological quality drivers (structural and functional traits); identify context-specific strategies to correct current negative trends (landscape ecology design approach); and assess the changes in the landscape ecological behavior provided by design scenarios. The applied methodology is low-cost and low-time-demanding and is based on multi-scale landscape ecology and land-use-based ES assessment; it implements a pattern-process-design approach. Analyses are applied to four northern Italian alluvial agricultural landscape systems. We specifically address landscape biodiversity support functions (landscape ecology indicators) and landscape multifunctionality (ES spatial assessment). We test the agroforestry approach (landscape feature insertions and crop diversification) as a key strategy to enhance ecological quality and ES, and we account for its contributions to context-specific design scenarios. This analytical toolkit might serve for future applications on similar case studies.
agroforestry; landscape features; landscape ecology; ecosystem services; Po Plain; Italy
Settore BIO/03 - Botanica Ambientale e Applicata
Settore BIO/07 - Ecologia
Settore ICAR/15 - Architettura del Paesaggio
   BIODIVERSITAS – L’AGROBIODIVERSITÀ PARTECIPATA. L’agrobiodiversità nelle aziende agricole Polyculturae del Piemonte Orientale
   BIODIVERSITAS
   COMPAGNIA DI SAN PAOLO
22-lug-2024
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
diversity-16-00431-v2 light.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 2.21 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.21 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1080328
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact