In § 37 of his "Elements of First Practical Philosophy", Baumgarten provides important qualifications to the controversial notion of ‘objective morality’, which had long been at the centre of the dispute between realists like Wolff and his adversaries. The chapter shall examine how he construes his view of morality in §§ 36-38 with a specific focus on the central § 37. I shall analyse that section, first considering how Baumgarten understands the key notion of ‘objective morality’ and how he argues for it, focusing both on its relational character and its connection with God’s will. Then I will examine the last, and arguably most surprising of the implications that he draws per negativum from the main claim, namely that affirming objective morality does not amount to rule out what Baumgarten calls ‘subjective morality’. Finally, I will briefly consider how Baumgarten’s distinctive way to take side in the Wolffian camp in that dispute reflects, through the close dialogue with the "Elements" in Kant’s private notes and lectures, on the development of Kant’s own views in practical philosophy.
Morality as Both Objective and Subjective: Baumgarten’s Way to Moral Realism and Its Impact on Kant / S. Bacin - In: Baumgarten and Kant on the Foundations of Practical Philosophy / [a cura di] C. Fugate, J. Hymers. - Prima edizione. - Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2024. - ISBN 0192873539. - pp. 90-105 [10.1093/oso/9780192873538.003.0006]
Morality as Both Objective and Subjective: Baumgarten’s Way to Moral Realism and Its Impact on Kant
S. Bacin
2024
Abstract
In § 37 of his "Elements of First Practical Philosophy", Baumgarten provides important qualifications to the controversial notion of ‘objective morality’, which had long been at the centre of the dispute between realists like Wolff and his adversaries. The chapter shall examine how he construes his view of morality in §§ 36-38 with a specific focus on the central § 37. I shall analyse that section, first considering how Baumgarten understands the key notion of ‘objective morality’ and how he argues for it, focusing both on its relational character and its connection with God’s will. Then I will examine the last, and arguably most surprising of the implications that he draws per negativum from the main claim, namely that affirming objective morality does not amount to rule out what Baumgarten calls ‘subjective morality’. Finally, I will briefly consider how Baumgarten’s distinctive way to take side in the Wolffian camp in that dispute reflects, through the close dialogue with the "Elements" in Kant’s private notes and lectures, on the development of Kant’s own views in practical philosophy.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Bacin 2024 BaumgartenOUP-preprint.pdf
accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Pre-print (manoscritto inviato all'editore)
Dimensione
499.6 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
499.6 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
|
Bacin 2024 Baumgarten OUP.pdf
accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione
1.62 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.62 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.




