Background: Trying to better define Bipolar Disorder (BD) progression, different staging models have been conceptualized, each one emphasizing different aspects of illness. In a previous article we retrospectively applied the main staging models to a sample of 100 bipolar patients at four time points over a ten-year observation. In the present study, focusing on Kupka & Hillegers's model, we aimed to assess the transition of the same sample through the different stages of illness and to explore the potential role of clinical variables on the risk of progression. Methods: Multistate Model using the mstate package in R and Markov model with stratified hazards were used for statistical analysis. Results: A high hazard of transition from stage 2 to 3 emerged, with a probability of staying in stage 2 decreasing to 14 % after 3 years. BD II and depressive predominant polarity were significantly associated with transition from stage 1 to 2, whereas the number of lifetime episodes >3 and the elevated predominant polarity with transition from stage 3 to 4. Conclusion: Our results corroborated the evidence on BD progression and contributed to outline its trajectory over time. Further effort may help to define a standardized staging approach towards ever increasing tailored interventions.

The progression trajectory of Bipolar Disorder: Results from the application of a staging model over a ten-year observation / L. Cremaschi, M. Macellaro, N. Girone, M. Bosi, B.M. Cesana, F. Ambrogi, B. Dell'Osso. - In: JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS. - ISSN 0165-0327. - (2024). [Epub ahead of print] [10.1016/j.jad.2024.06.094]

The progression trajectory of Bipolar Disorder: Results from the application of a staging model over a ten-year observation

L. Cremaschi
Primo
;
M. Bosi;F. Ambrogi
Penultimo
;
B. Dell'Osso
Ultimo
2024

Abstract

Background: Trying to better define Bipolar Disorder (BD) progression, different staging models have been conceptualized, each one emphasizing different aspects of illness. In a previous article we retrospectively applied the main staging models to a sample of 100 bipolar patients at four time points over a ten-year observation. In the present study, focusing on Kupka & Hillegers's model, we aimed to assess the transition of the same sample through the different stages of illness and to explore the potential role of clinical variables on the risk of progression. Methods: Multistate Model using the mstate package in R and Markov model with stratified hazards were used for statistical analysis. Results: A high hazard of transition from stage 2 to 3 emerged, with a probability of staying in stage 2 decreasing to 14 % after 3 years. BD II and depressive predominant polarity were significantly associated with transition from stage 1 to 2, whereas the number of lifetime episodes >3 and the elevated predominant polarity with transition from stage 3 to 4. Conclusion: Our results corroborated the evidence on BD progression and contributed to outline its trajectory over time. Further effort may help to define a standardized staging approach towards ever increasing tailored interventions.
Bipolar disorder; Clinical staging; Disease progression; Multi-state model; Retrospective study; Staging model
Settore MED/25 - Psichiatria
2024
27-giu-2024
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
STAGING BD.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Research Paper
Tipologia: Post-print, accepted manuscript ecc. (versione accettata dall'editore)
Dimensione 1.71 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.71 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1070009
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact