Quantitative coronary computed tomography assessment for differentiating between total occlusions and severe stenoses

Backgrounds: The impact of quantitative assessment to differentiate total occlusions (TOs) from severe stenoses on coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) remains unknown. Objective: This study investigated whether quantitative characteristics assessed on CCTA could help differentiate a TO from a severe stenosis on invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Methods: This study is a sub-analysis of the FASTTRACK CABG (NCT04142021) in which both CCTA and ICA were routinely performed. Quantitative analysis was performed with semi-automated CCTA plaque-analysis software. Blinded analysts compared TOs on CCTA, defined as a complete lack of contrast opacification within the coronary occlusion, with corresponding ICA. Results: Eighty-four TOs were seen on CCTA in 59 of the 114 patients enrolled in the trial. The concordance in diagnosing a TO between ICA and CCTA was 56.0% (n ​= ​47). Compared to severe stenoses, TOs had a significantly longer lesion length (25.1 ​± ​23.0 ​mm vs 9.4 ​± ​11.2 ​mm, P ​< ​0.001). The best cut-off value to differentiate a TO from severe stenosis was a lesion length of 5.5 ​mm (area under the curve 0.77, 95% CI: 0.66–0.87), with a 91.1% sensitivity and 61.1% specificity. Dense calcium percentage atheroma volume (PAV) was significantly higher in TOs compared to severe stenoses (18.7 ​± ​19.6% vs. 6.6 ​± ​13.0%, P ​< ​0.001), whilst the opposite was seen for fibro-fatty PAV (31.3 ​± ​14.2% vs. 19.5 ​± ​10.5%, P ​< ​0.001). On a multivariable logistic regression analysis, lesion length (>5.5 ​mm) was the only parameter associated with differentiating a TO from a severe stenosis. Conclusion: In quantitative CCTA analysis, a lesion length >5.5 ​mm was the only independent predictor differentiating a TO from a severe stenosis. NCT registration number: NCT04142021.