Sigmund Freud was one of the first thinkers to claim that some forms of Marxism have religious traits. This notwithstanding, in his Secular Religion Hans Kelsen discusses neither Freud’s treatment of Marxism nor his concept of religion. In Section 1, Fittipaldi briefly examines Freud’s treatment of the religious aspects of Marxism. Section 2 is dedicated to the reconstruction of Freud’s notion of religion as a polythetic conceptualization comprised of an ontogonical, a mellontological, a technological, a theistic, and a goneological component – a prototypical religion being comprised of all of them. Next, in Section 3, Fittipaldi discusses whether such a Freudian conceptualization involves the characterization of Buddhism, Marxism, and medicine as forms of quasi-religions – a characterization strongly rejected by Kelsen with regard to Buddhism and Marxism. Section 4 is dedicated to listing the differences between Freud’s and Kelsen’s notions of religion and – whenever possible – exploring their philosophical roots. Finally, Fittipaldi summarizes the results of this inquiry.

Conceptualizing Religion (and Quasi-Religions): An elaboration on Freud in the “Light” of Kelsen / E. Fittipaldi. - In: TEORIA E CRITICA DELLA REGOLAZIONE SOCIALE. - ISSN 1970-5476. - 2:27(2023), pp. 65-84. [10.7413/197054760113]

Conceptualizing Religion (and Quasi-Religions): An elaboration on Freud in the “Light” of Kelsen.

E. Fittipaldi
2023

Abstract

Sigmund Freud was one of the first thinkers to claim that some forms of Marxism have religious traits. This notwithstanding, in his Secular Religion Hans Kelsen discusses neither Freud’s treatment of Marxism nor his concept of religion. In Section 1, Fittipaldi briefly examines Freud’s treatment of the religious aspects of Marxism. Section 2 is dedicated to the reconstruction of Freud’s notion of religion as a polythetic conceptualization comprised of an ontogonical, a mellontological, a technological, a theistic, and a goneological component – a prototypical religion being comprised of all of them. Next, in Section 3, Fittipaldi discusses whether such a Freudian conceptualization involves the characterization of Buddhism, Marxism, and medicine as forms of quasi-religions – a characterization strongly rejected by Kelsen with regard to Buddhism and Marxism. Section 4 is dedicated to listing the differences between Freud’s and Kelsen’s notions of religion and – whenever possible – exploring their philosophical roots. Finally, Fittipaldi summarizes the results of this inquiry.
Freud; Kelsen; Secular Religion; Freud’s Conceptualization of Religion;
Settore IUS/20 - Filosofia del Diritto
2023
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2023 - Conceptualizing Religion (Kelsen & Freud).pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 213.14 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
213.14 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1051949
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact