From the actor-centric perspective of party politics, it is widely held that the two transitional outcomes observed in Tunisia and Egypt are the result of the different degree of polarization across the two party systems. Through a quantitative text analysis of the party manifestos of the main transitional parties in Tunisia and Egypt, this contribution shows that the end result of the two transitional experiences has actually little to do with polarization and it is rather due to the way political parties structured political competition during the founding elections.
The ‘myth of moderation’ following the Arab Uprisings: polarization in Tunisia and Egypt’s founding elections / V. Resta. - In: BRITISH JOURNAL OF MIDDLE EASTERN STUDIES. - ISSN 1353-0194. - 50:3(2023 May 27), pp. 749-767. [10.1080/13530194.2021.2023353]
The ‘myth of moderation’ following the Arab Uprisings: polarization in Tunisia and Egypt’s founding elections
V. Resta
2023
Abstract
From the actor-centric perspective of party politics, it is widely held that the two transitional outcomes observed in Tunisia and Egypt are the result of the different degree of polarization across the two party systems. Through a quantitative text analysis of the party manifestos of the main transitional parties in Tunisia and Egypt, this contribution shows that the end result of the two transitional experiences has actually little to do with polarization and it is rather due to the way political parties structured political competition during the founding elections.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Resta2022_BJMES.pdf
accesso riservato
Tipologia:
Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione
18 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
18 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.