Background Research and development (R&D) of new drugs and regimens against tuberculosis (TB) is evolving to meet new challenges and face limited investments in the sector. To effectively improve and fill existing gaps, researchers and trialists should engage a broad spectrum of stakeholders. With this study, we aim to map the interests in TB R&D raised by the main stakeholders in the TB field. Methods We conducted semistructured, short interviews to gather insight and viewpoints on innovation on TB drugs and regimens R&D of policy-makers, national TB programme officers, donors, funders, non-governmental organisations and research institutions. A composite measure of the relevance of topics that emerged was computed by implementing different models considering the importance for researchers and the urgency to implement those changes during the trial, the number of citations each topic received, and the maximum value of the influence of stakeholders who had raised the topic. Results 50 stakeholders, out of 56 identified, were interviewed and almost half were policy-makers and governmental institutions. Several stakeholders highlighted the importance of disseminating information about clinical trials’ methodology and emerging preliminary results, followed by the need to pursue early discussion around access and pricing of safe and effective TB innovations, although different categories of stakeholders prioritised different topics. Using different methods for ranking topics, the results remained almost unchanged. Notably, post-trial operational research ranked higher in models with higher weight for the parameter considering the number of citations. Conclusion Researchers and research consortia embarking on phase 2 and 3 clinical trials should consider a broad set of elements when planning and designing trials’ protocols, all aiming at lowering the price and improving access to emerging TB innovations, besides meeting regulatory criteria. This can only be achieved by consulting and engaging relevant stakeholders in the discussion.

Towards comprehensive clinical trials for new tuberculosis drug regimens: policy recommendations from a stakeholder analysis / S. Villa, P. de Colombani, L. Dall’Olio, G. Gargioni, M. Raviglione. - In: BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH. - ISSN 2059-7908. - 9:4(2024 Apr 22), pp. e014630.1-e014630.9. [10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014630]

Towards comprehensive clinical trials for new tuberculosis drug regimens: policy recommendations from a stakeholder analysis

S. Villa
Primo
;
L. Dall’Olio;G. Gargioni
Penultimo
;
M. Raviglione
Ultimo
2024

Abstract

Background Research and development (R&D) of new drugs and regimens against tuberculosis (TB) is evolving to meet new challenges and face limited investments in the sector. To effectively improve and fill existing gaps, researchers and trialists should engage a broad spectrum of stakeholders. With this study, we aim to map the interests in TB R&D raised by the main stakeholders in the TB field. Methods We conducted semistructured, short interviews to gather insight and viewpoints on innovation on TB drugs and regimens R&D of policy-makers, national TB programme officers, donors, funders, non-governmental organisations and research institutions. A composite measure of the relevance of topics that emerged was computed by implementing different models considering the importance for researchers and the urgency to implement those changes during the trial, the number of citations each topic received, and the maximum value of the influence of stakeholders who had raised the topic. Results 50 stakeholders, out of 56 identified, were interviewed and almost half were policy-makers and governmental institutions. Several stakeholders highlighted the importance of disseminating information about clinical trials’ methodology and emerging preliminary results, followed by the need to pursue early discussion around access and pricing of safe and effective TB innovations, although different categories of stakeholders prioritised different topics. Using different methods for ranking topics, the results remained almost unchanged. Notably, post-trial operational research ranked higher in models with higher weight for the parameter considering the number of citations. Conclusion Researchers and research consortia embarking on phase 2 and 3 clinical trials should consider a broad set of elements when planning and designing trials’ protocols, all aiming at lowering the price and improving access to emerging TB innovations, besides meeting regulatory criteria. This can only be achieved by consulting and engaging relevant stakeholders in the discussion.
No
English
Settore MED/42 - Igiene Generale e Applicata
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Pubblicazione scientifica
Goal 3: Good health and well-being
   Academia and Industry United Innovation and Treatment for Tuberculosis (UNITE4TB)
   UNITE4TB
   EUROPEAN COMMISSION
   101007873
22-apr-2024
British Medical Journal (BMJ) Publishing Group
9
4
e014630
1
9
9
Pubblicato
Periodico con rilevanza internazionale
Center for multidisciplinary research in health science
crossref
Aderisco
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Towards comprehensive clinical trials for new tuberculosis drug regimens: policy recommendations from a stakeholder analysis / S. Villa, P. de Colombani, L. Dall’Olio, G. Gargioni, M. Raviglione. - In: BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH. - ISSN 2059-7908. - 9:4(2024 Apr 22), pp. e014630.1-e014630.9. [10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014630]
open
Prodotti della ricerca::01 - Articolo su periodico
5
262
Article (author)
Periodico con Impact Factor
S. Villa, P. de Colombani, L. Dall’Olio, G. Gargioni, M. Raviglione
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
e014630.full.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 331.55 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
331.55 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1047157
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact