This chapter focuses on the ability of UN peacekeepers to successfully settle civil conflicts and seeks to shed more light on three categories of outcomes that are often thought to be intricately linked to the concept of conflict resolution: conflict intensity, peace duration and conflict recurrence. First, we present a systematic summary of the impact of UN peace operations on these three dimensions and explain how and through which mechanisms peacekeepers can affect conflict intensity, peace duration and conflict recurrence. Then we critically examine whether thinking about conflict as something that can be resolved by decreasing fatality counts, prolonging post-conflict peace, or preventing renewed conflict risks constraining our understanding of peacekeeping effectiveness. We argue that what can at first sight be claimed as the resolution of a conflict can mean very different things empirically. In cases where we observe an absence of, or a decline in, violence, we can face problems of equifinality because different trajectories with different implications for conflict resolution might produce the same outcome.

Peacekeeping and conflict resolution / E. Kroeker, A. Ruggeri (POLITICAL SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY). - In: Handbook on Peacekeeping and International Relations / [a cura di] H. Dorussen. - [s.l] : Edward Elgar, 2023. - ISBN 9781839109935. - pp. 182-195 [10.4337/9781839109935.00024]

Peacekeeping and conflict resolution

A. Ruggeri
2023

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the ability of UN peacekeepers to successfully settle civil conflicts and seeks to shed more light on three categories of outcomes that are often thought to be intricately linked to the concept of conflict resolution: conflict intensity, peace duration and conflict recurrence. First, we present a systematic summary of the impact of UN peace operations on these three dimensions and explain how and through which mechanisms peacekeepers can affect conflict intensity, peace duration and conflict recurrence. Then we critically examine whether thinking about conflict as something that can be resolved by decreasing fatality counts, prolonging post-conflict peace, or preventing renewed conflict risks constraining our understanding of peacekeeping effectiveness. We argue that what can at first sight be claimed as the resolution of a conflict can mean very different things empirically. In cases where we observe an absence of, or a decline in, violence, we can face problems of equifinality because different trajectories with different implications for conflict resolution might produce the same outcome.
Conflict; Conflict resolution; United Nations; Peace operations; Peacekeeping
Settore SPS/04 - Scienza Politica
2023
Book Part (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Kroeker&Ruggeri2021.pdf

accesso riservato

Tipologia: Pre-print (manoscritto inviato all'editore)
Dimensione 250.23 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
250.23 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1044792
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact