Background & aims: The escalating prevalence of diabetes mellitus may benefit from add-on therapeutic approaches. Given the recognized need for an updated synthesis of the literature, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesize and critically assess the available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigate the efficacy of probiotics and synbiotics on glycemic control in patients with Type 1 (T1DM) and Type 2 (T2DM) diabetes mellitus. Methods: Comprehensive searches were conducted on PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science, focusing on adults with T1DM or T2DM. All comparators were deemed eligible. Primary outcomes included changes in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and insulin levels. Only RCTs were included, and the Cochrane RoB2 tool assessed the risk of bias. Random-effect models facilitated data analysis, supplemented by sensitivity, subgroup analyses, and meta-regressions. Results: A total of 537 records were screened, resulting in 41 RCTs for analysis, which comprises 2991 (54% females) patients with diabetes. The meta-analysis revealed statistically significant improvements in HbA1c (standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.282, 95% CI: [-0.37, -0.19], p < 0.001), FPG (SMD = -0.175, 95% CI: [-0.26, -0.09], p < 0.001), and insulin levels (SMD = -0.273, 95% CI: [-0.35, -0.20], p < 0.001). A medium degree of heterogeneity between studies was found in HbA1c (I2 = 62.5%), FPG (I2 = 71.5%), and insulin levels (I2 = 66.4%) analyses. Subgroup analyses indicated that the efficacy varied based on the type of strains used and the country. Multispecies strains were particularly effective in improving HbA1c levels. Conclusion: The study findings suggest that probiotics and synbiotics may be effective as complementary therapies for managing diabetes. Additionally, the study underscores the need for further tailored research that considers variables such as strain types and geographical factors to deepen the understanding of the role of these interventions in diabetes care. Review registration number: PROSPERO (CRD42023396348).

Probiotics and synbiotics for glycemic control in diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials / I. Baroni, D. Fabrizi, M. Luciani, A. Magon, G. Conte, G. De Angeli, G. Paglione, D. Ausili, R. Caruso. - In: CLINICAL NUTRITION. - ISSN 0261-5614. - 43:4(2024), pp. 1041-1061. [10.1016/j.clnu.2024.03.006]

Probiotics and synbiotics for glycemic control in diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

R. Caruso
Ultimo
Supervision
2024

Abstract

Background & aims: The escalating prevalence of diabetes mellitus may benefit from add-on therapeutic approaches. Given the recognized need for an updated synthesis of the literature, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesize and critically assess the available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigate the efficacy of probiotics and synbiotics on glycemic control in patients with Type 1 (T1DM) and Type 2 (T2DM) diabetes mellitus. Methods: Comprehensive searches were conducted on PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science, focusing on adults with T1DM or T2DM. All comparators were deemed eligible. Primary outcomes included changes in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and insulin levels. Only RCTs were included, and the Cochrane RoB2 tool assessed the risk of bias. Random-effect models facilitated data analysis, supplemented by sensitivity, subgroup analyses, and meta-regressions. Results: A total of 537 records were screened, resulting in 41 RCTs for analysis, which comprises 2991 (54% females) patients with diabetes. The meta-analysis revealed statistically significant improvements in HbA1c (standardized mean difference (SMD) = -0.282, 95% CI: [-0.37, -0.19], p < 0.001), FPG (SMD = -0.175, 95% CI: [-0.26, -0.09], p < 0.001), and insulin levels (SMD = -0.273, 95% CI: [-0.35, -0.20], p < 0.001). A medium degree of heterogeneity between studies was found in HbA1c (I2 = 62.5%), FPG (I2 = 71.5%), and insulin levels (I2 = 66.4%) analyses. Subgroup analyses indicated that the efficacy varied based on the type of strains used and the country. Multispecies strains were particularly effective in improving HbA1c levels. Conclusion: The study findings suggest that probiotics and synbiotics may be effective as complementary therapies for managing diabetes. Additionally, the study underscores the need for further tailored research that considers variables such as strain types and geographical factors to deepen the understanding of the role of these interventions in diabetes care. Review registration number: PROSPERO (CRD42023396348).
No
English
Care; Diabetes mellitus; Glycemic control; Meta-analysis; Probiotics; Synbiotics
Settore MED/45 - Scienze Infermieristiche Generali, Cliniche e Pediatriche
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Pubblicazione scientifica
Goal 3: Good health and well-being
2024
20-mar-2024
Elsevier
43
4
1041
1061
21
Pubblicato
Periodico con rilevanza internazionale
pubmed
Aderisco
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Probiotics and synbiotics for glycemic control in diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials / I. Baroni, D. Fabrizi, M. Luciani, A. Magon, G. Conte, G. De Angeli, G. Paglione, D. Ausili, R. Caruso. - In: CLINICAL NUTRITION. - ISSN 0261-5614. - 43:4(2024), pp. 1041-1061. [10.1016/j.clnu.2024.03.006]
open
Prodotti della ricerca::01 - Articolo su periodico
9
262
Article (author)
Periodico con Impact Factor
I. Baroni, D. Fabrizi, M. Luciani, A. Magon, G. Conte, G. De Angeli, G. Paglione, D. Ausili, R. Caruso
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S0261561424000803-main (1).pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Meta-analyses
Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 2.71 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.71 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1043870
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact