This paper explores taste fragmentalism, a novel approach to matters of taste and faultless disagreement. The view is inspired by Kit Fine’s fragmentalism about time, according to which the temporal dimension can be constituted—in an absolute manner—by states that are pairwise incompatible, provided that they do not obtain together. In the present paper, we will apply this metaphysical framework to taste states. In our proposal, two incompatible taste states (such as the state of rhubarb’s being tasty and the state of rhubarb’s being distasteful) can both constitute reality in an absolute manner, although no agent can have joint access to both states. We will then develop a formalised version of our view by means of an exact truthmaker semantics for taste assertions. Within this framework—we argue—our linguistic and inferential practices concerning cases of faultless disagreement are elegantly vindi- cated, thus suggesting that taste fragmentalism is worth of further consideration.

Taste fragmentalism / G. Spolaore, S. Iaquinto, G. Torrengo. - In: ERKENNTNIS. - ISSN 0165-0106. - 90:4(2025 Apr), pp. 1343-1361. [10.1007/s10670-023-00754-8]

Taste fragmentalism

G. Torrengo
Ultimo
2025

Abstract

This paper explores taste fragmentalism, a novel approach to matters of taste and faultless disagreement. The view is inspired by Kit Fine’s fragmentalism about time, according to which the temporal dimension can be constituted—in an absolute manner—by states that are pairwise incompatible, provided that they do not obtain together. In the present paper, we will apply this metaphysical framework to taste states. In our proposal, two incompatible taste states (such as the state of rhubarb’s being tasty and the state of rhubarb’s being distasteful) can both constitute reality in an absolute manner, although no agent can have joint access to both states. We will then develop a formalised version of our view by means of an exact truthmaker semantics for taste assertions. Within this framework—we argue—our linguistic and inferential practices concerning cases of faultless disagreement are elegantly vindi- cated, thus suggesting that taste fragmentalism is worth of further consideration.
fragmentalism; faultless disagreement; taste
Settore M-FIL/05 - Filosofia e Teoria dei Linguaggi
Settore M-FIL/02 - Logica e Filosofia della Scienza
Settore PHIL-04/B - Filosofia e teoria dei linguaggi
Settore PHIL-02/A - Logica e filosofia della scienza
   The Varieties of Grounding
   MINISTERO DELL'UNIVERSITA' E DELLA RICERCA
   2022NTCHYF_003

   Assegnazione Dipartimenti di Eccellenza 2023-2027 - Dipartimento di FILOSOFIA "PIERO MARTINETTI"
   DECC23_007
   MINISTERO DELL'UNIVERSITA' E DELLA RICERCA
apr-2025
1-dic-2023
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2571640C-9122-11EE-9F45-E50D00AD0410.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: online first
Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.21 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.21 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
s10670-023-00754-8.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 972.12 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
972.12 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1041528
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact