The Mīmāṃsā school of Indian philosophy elaborated complex ways of interpreting the prescriptive portions of the Vedic sacred texts. The present article is the result of the collaboration of a group of scholars of logic, computer science, European philosophy and Indian philosophy and aims at the individuation and analysis of the deontic system which is applied but never explicitly discussed in Mīmāṃsā texts. The article outlines the basic distinction between three sorts of principles —hermeneutic, linguistic and deontic. It proposes a mathematical formalization of the deontic principles and uses it to discuss a well-known example of seemingly conflicting statements, namely the prescription to undertake the malefic Śyena sacrifice and the prohibition to perform any harm.

Understanding Prescriptive Texts: Rules and Logic as Elaborated by the Mīmāṃsā School / E. Freschi, A. Ciabattoni, F.A. Genco, B. Lellmann. - In: JOURNAL OF WORLD PHILOSOPHIES. - ISSN 2474-1795. - 2:1(2017), pp. 47-66. [10.2979/jourworlphil.2.1.05]

Understanding Prescriptive Texts: Rules and Logic as Elaborated by the Mīmāṃsā School

F.A. Genco;
2017

Abstract

The Mīmāṃsā school of Indian philosophy elaborated complex ways of interpreting the prescriptive portions of the Vedic sacred texts. The present article is the result of the collaboration of a group of scholars of logic, computer science, European philosophy and Indian philosophy and aims at the individuation and analysis of the deontic system which is applied but never explicitly discussed in Mīmāṃsā texts. The article outlines the basic distinction between three sorts of principles —hermeneutic, linguistic and deontic. It proposes a mathematical formalization of the deontic principles and uses it to discuss a well-known example of seemingly conflicting statements, namely the prescription to undertake the malefic Śyena sacrifice and the prohibition to perform any harm.
deontic logic; Mīmāṃsā; language as a means of knowledge; hermeneutics of sacred texts; epistemic value of prescriptive texts; conflicting obligations; proof theory
Settore M-FIL/02 - Logica e Filosofia della Scienza
2017
https://scholarworks.iu.edu/iupjournals/index.php/jwp/article/view/922
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
JWP.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 587.06 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
587.06 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1035249
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact