Objective The goal of this study was to explore additional evidence of convergent and discriminant validity of the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) in a large sample of subjects with fibromyalgia (FM). Methods Patients were consecutively enrolled for a cross-sectional assessment comprehensive of three FM-specific measures (the revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire [FIQR], the modified Fibromyalgia Assessment Status [modFAS], and the Polysymptomatic Distress Scale [PDS]) and of CSI. To test the convergent validity, the Spearman's rho was used to measure the degree of correlation between the variables CSI and the FM-specific measures. To assess discriminant validity, CSI scores were grouped according to FIQR disease severity states, and differences between these groups studied with the Kruskal-Wallis test. Interpretative cutoffs were established with the interquartile reconciliation approach. Results The study included 562 FM patients, 199 (35.4%) were classified as having central sensitization syndrome (CSI >= 40). CSI was largely correlated with modFAS (rho = 0.580; p < 0.0001), FIQR (rho = 0.542; p < 0.0001), and PDS (rho = 0.518; p < 0.0001). The differences between the CSI scores in accordance with the FIQR were significant (p < 0.000001). CSI cutoffs proposed for FM: 21 between remission and mild severity, 30 between mild and moderate severity, 37 between moderate and severe disease, and 51 between severe and very severe disease. Conclusion The current study successfully showed additional evidence of the convergent and discriminant validity of the CSI in FM patients.

Validity of the Central Sensitization Inventory compared with traditional measures of disease severity in fibromyalgia / F. Salaffi, S. Farah, C. Mariani, P. Sarzi‐puttini, M. Di Carlo. - In: PAIN PRACTICE. - ISSN 1530-7085. - 22:8(2022), pp. 702-710. [10.1111/papr.13162]

Validity of the Central Sensitization Inventory compared with traditional measures of disease severity in fibromyalgia

P. Sarzi‐puttini
Penultimo
;
2022

Abstract

Objective The goal of this study was to explore additional evidence of convergent and discriminant validity of the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) in a large sample of subjects with fibromyalgia (FM). Methods Patients were consecutively enrolled for a cross-sectional assessment comprehensive of three FM-specific measures (the revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire [FIQR], the modified Fibromyalgia Assessment Status [modFAS], and the Polysymptomatic Distress Scale [PDS]) and of CSI. To test the convergent validity, the Spearman's rho was used to measure the degree of correlation between the variables CSI and the FM-specific measures. To assess discriminant validity, CSI scores were grouped according to FIQR disease severity states, and differences between these groups studied with the Kruskal-Wallis test. Interpretative cutoffs were established with the interquartile reconciliation approach. Results The study included 562 FM patients, 199 (35.4%) were classified as having central sensitization syndrome (CSI >= 40). CSI was largely correlated with modFAS (rho = 0.580; p < 0.0001), FIQR (rho = 0.542; p < 0.0001), and PDS (rho = 0.518; p < 0.0001). The differences between the CSI scores in accordance with the FIQR were significant (p < 0.000001). CSI cutoffs proposed for FM: 21 between remission and mild severity, 30 between mild and moderate severity, 37 between moderate and severe disease, and 51 between severe and very severe disease. Conclusion The current study successfully showed additional evidence of the convergent and discriminant validity of the CSI in FM patients.
Central Sensitization Inventory; central sensitization syndrome; chronic pain; fibromyalgia; psychometric validation
Settore MED/16 - Reumatologia
2022
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Pain Practice - 2022 - Salaffi - Validity of the Central Sensitization Inventory compared with traditional measures of.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 702.34 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
702.34 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1032454
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 5
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact