To quantitatively evaluate the possible advantages of quantifying and differentiating various soft tissues using virtual monochromatic images (VMI) derived from different dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) technologies. This study involved four DECT scanners with different technologies. CIRS phantom images were acquired in single-energy (SECT) and DECT modes with each scanner. The analysis focused on five equivalent soft-tissue inserts: adipose, breast, liver, muscle, and bone (200 mg). The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was calculated for each equivalent soft-tissue insert. Finally, the contrasts of tissue pairs between DECT and SECT images were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests adjusted for multiple comparisons. Average CT numbers and noise showed a significant difference pattern between DECT with respect to SECT for each CT scanner. Generally, energy levels of 70 keV or higher led to improved SNR in VMI for most of the equivalent soft-tissue inserts. However, energy levels of 40–50 keV showed significantly higher contrasts in most of the equivalent soft-tissue insert pairs. DECT images at low energies, especially at 40–50 keV, outperform SECT images in discriminating soft tissues across all four DECT technologies. The combined use of DECT images reconstructed at different energy levels provides a more comprehensive set of information for diagnostic and/or radiotherapy evaluation compared to SECT. Some differences between scanners are evident, depending on the DECT acquisition technique and reconstruction method.

Enhancing Soft Tissue Differentiation with Different Dual-Energy CT Systems: A Phantom Study / P. Gallo, A. D’Alessio, R. Pascuzzo, S. Gallo, M. Fumagalli, O. Ortenzia, C. Tenconi, C. Cavatorta, E. Pignoli, C. Ghetti, M. Bruzzone, E. De Martin. - In: APPLIED SCIENCES. - ISSN 2076-3417. - 14:5(2024 Feb 24), pp. 1724.1-1724.15. [10.3390/app14051724]

Enhancing Soft Tissue Differentiation with Different Dual-Energy CT Systems: A Phantom Study

S. Gallo
;
M. Fumagalli;C. Cavatorta;E. Pignoli;
2024

Abstract

To quantitatively evaluate the possible advantages of quantifying and differentiating various soft tissues using virtual monochromatic images (VMI) derived from different dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) technologies. This study involved four DECT scanners with different technologies. CIRS phantom images were acquired in single-energy (SECT) and DECT modes with each scanner. The analysis focused on five equivalent soft-tissue inserts: adipose, breast, liver, muscle, and bone (200 mg). The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was calculated for each equivalent soft-tissue insert. Finally, the contrasts of tissue pairs between DECT and SECT images were compared using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests adjusted for multiple comparisons. Average CT numbers and noise showed a significant difference pattern between DECT with respect to SECT for each CT scanner. Generally, energy levels of 70 keV or higher led to improved SNR in VMI for most of the equivalent soft-tissue inserts. However, energy levels of 40–50 keV showed significantly higher contrasts in most of the equivalent soft-tissue insert pairs. DECT images at low energies, especially at 40–50 keV, outperform SECT images in discriminating soft tissues across all four DECT technologies. The combined use of DECT images reconstructed at different energy levels provides a more comprehensive set of information for diagnostic and/or radiotherapy evaluation compared to SECT. Some differences between scanners are evident, depending on the DECT acquisition technique and reconstruction method.
dual-energy CT; soft tissue; SNR; virtual monochromatic imaging
Settore FIS/07 - Fisica Applicata(Beni Culturali, Ambientali, Biol.e Medicin)
Settore MED/36 - Diagnostica per Immagini e Radioterapia
24-feb-2024
24-feb-2024
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/14/5/1724
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
applsci-14-01724-v2.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Article
Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 3.13 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.13 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1030881
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact