EMA and FDA are upgrading guidelines on assessing the quality and the equivalence of topically applied drug products for developing copies of originator products and supporting post-marketing variations. For topical products having remarkably similar composition, both EMA and FDA accept the equivalence on the bases of the comparison of rheological properties and in vitro drug release constant (k) and skin permeation flux (J) values, instead of clinical studies. This work aims to evaluate the feasibility to expand this approach to variations of the composition of complex semi-solid preparations. Ibuprofen (IB) creams at two different strengths (i.e., 1 % and 10 %) were used as a model formulation. Two formulative changes were performed: (a) the addition of the humectant to simulate a minor post-marketing variation; (b) the substitution of the emulsifying system to simulate a major one. These variations impacted only in 1 % IB formulations where both the equivalences of rheological data and J-values failed. At the highest concentration, the presence of IB crystals broke down the differences in rheological patterns and lead the IB thermodynamic activity at the maximum figuring out an overlapping of the J-values. Such data suggest the combination of these studies, which are thought mainly for the development of copies, could be also applied to the management of post-marketing variations that involve product composition.

Equivalence assessment of creams with quali-quantitative differences in light of the EMA and FDA regulatory framework / P. Volonte', U.M. Musazzi, L. Arnaboldi, M.A. Ortenzi, A. Casiraghi, F. Cilurzo, P. Minghetti. - In: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCES. - ISSN 0928-0987. - 195:(2024 Apr 01), pp. 106726.1-106726.10. [10.1016/j.ejps.2024.106726]

Equivalence assessment of creams with quali-quantitative differences in light of the EMA and FDA regulatory framework

P. Volonte'
Primo
;
U.M. Musazzi
Secondo
;
L. Arnaboldi;M.A. Ortenzi;A. Casiraghi;F. Cilurzo
Penultimo
;
P. Minghetti
Ultimo
2024

Abstract

EMA and FDA are upgrading guidelines on assessing the quality and the equivalence of topically applied drug products for developing copies of originator products and supporting post-marketing variations. For topical products having remarkably similar composition, both EMA and FDA accept the equivalence on the bases of the comparison of rheological properties and in vitro drug release constant (k) and skin permeation flux (J) values, instead of clinical studies. This work aims to evaluate the feasibility to expand this approach to variations of the composition of complex semi-solid preparations. Ibuprofen (IB) creams at two different strengths (i.e., 1 % and 10 %) were used as a model formulation. Two formulative changes were performed: (a) the addition of the humectant to simulate a minor post-marketing variation; (b) the substitution of the emulsifying system to simulate a major one. These variations impacted only in 1 % IB formulations where both the equivalences of rheological data and J-values failed. At the highest concentration, the presence of IB crystals broke down the differences in rheological patterns and lead the IB thermodynamic activity at the maximum figuring out an overlapping of the J-values. Such data suggest the combination of these studies, which are thought mainly for the development of copies, could be also applied to the management of post-marketing variations that involve product composition.
Drug release; Equivalence; In vitro; Regulatory; Rheology; Semi-solid preparations; Skin permeation;
Settore CHIM/09 - Farmaceutico Tecnologico Applicativo
1-apr-2024
12-feb-2024
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Equivalence assessment of creams with quali-quantitative differences in light of the EMA and FDA regulatory framework.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 1.22 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.22 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1030149
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact