This brief article is a consideration on the theme of Quality Assessment (QA) criteria in the British university sector. It will attempt to shed light on a variety of conceptualisations on this instrument which is commonly considered a means to achieve a more efficient university sector which can prosper by working on the quality of education that is delivered to students whilst at the same time responding to reforms, which have pushed for a greater “value-for-money” of public resources used by universities. Whereas the majority of recent literature give an overview of the current state of the university system, this article instead sheds a focus of quality assessment criteria on an aspect which is treated as a marginal detail, namely, the historical origins of these criteria. By bringing some historical evidence to the forefront, this article will show how an attentive reflection on the birth of quality assessment criteria can show some problematic aspects of literatures which tend to explain and study QA as instruments that contain a logic of some sort. When literatures of different approaches prioritise a logic at work for explaining the functioning of QA criteria, this article argues, they tend to ignore that the conception of QA was vested with a variety of interests of different agents.

Beyond Marketization? The Genesis of Quality Assessment Criteria in the British niversity Sector between 1985 and 1992 / L. Giovinazzi. - In: STUDIA POLITICA. - ISSN 1582-4551. - 18:4(2018), pp. 631-647.

Beyond Marketization? The Genesis of Quality Assessment Criteria in the British niversity Sector between 1985 and 1992

L. Giovinazzi
Primo
2018

Abstract

This brief article is a consideration on the theme of Quality Assessment (QA) criteria in the British university sector. It will attempt to shed light on a variety of conceptualisations on this instrument which is commonly considered a means to achieve a more efficient university sector which can prosper by working on the quality of education that is delivered to students whilst at the same time responding to reforms, which have pushed for a greater “value-for-money” of public resources used by universities. Whereas the majority of recent literature give an overview of the current state of the university system, this article instead sheds a focus of quality assessment criteria on an aspect which is treated as a marginal detail, namely, the historical origins of these criteria. By bringing some historical evidence to the forefront, this article will show how an attentive reflection on the birth of quality assessment criteria can show some problematic aspects of literatures which tend to explain and study QA as instruments that contain a logic of some sort. When literatures of different approaches prioritise a logic at work for explaining the functioning of QA criteria, this article argues, they tend to ignore that the conception of QA was vested with a variety of interests of different agents.
evaluation; new public management; higher education, United Kingdom
Settore SPS/04 - Scienza Politica
2018
https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/61134/ssoar-sp-rpsr-2018-4-giovinazzi-Beyond_marketization_the_genesis_of.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y&lnkname=ssoar-sp-rpsr-2018-4-giovinazzi-Beyond_marketization_the_genesis_of.pdf
Article (author)
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
giovinazzi_2018_studiapolitica.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Article
Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 234.87 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
234.87 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1027648
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact