The level of implementation of biosecurity measures (BMs), the reasons for not implementing BMs and the effectiveness of BMs were assessed according to the perceptions of stakeholders (i.e., farmers and advisors) in Italian poultry farms. For this purpose, data were collected using a questionnaire administered to advisors (n = 37) and farmers (n = 30) of conventional broiler (n = 13) and layer (n = 13), free-range broiler (n = 8) and layer (n = 10), turkey (n = 13), duck (n = 3) and breeder (n = 7) farms between April and September 2021. The frequency of the implementation of BMs was 66.97% and 81.14% according to the answers provided by the advisors and farmers, respectively, with the breeder sector showing the highest level of implementation (85.71%). “Not knowing advantages” (21.49% for advisors) and “other/specific reasons” (21.49% for advisors and 38.32% for farmers) were the most common answers regarding the lack of implementation of BMs for all poultry sectors. Only 31.09% of farmers acknowledged the effectiveness of not-implemented BMs in contrast to 61.02% of advisors, with the layers’ stakeholders being the most aware. The findings of this study may be useful for identifying failures in biosecurity and failures to develop intervention strategies to fulfil the biosecurity gaps still present in Italian poultry farms.

Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Biosecurity Implementation in Italian Poultry Farms / A. Laconi, G. Tilli, F. Galuppo, G. Grilli, R. Souillard, A. Piccirillo. - In: ANIMALS. - ISSN 2076-2615. - 13:20(2023 Oct 18), pp. 3246.1-3246.15. [10.3390/ani13203246]

Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Biosecurity Implementation in Italian Poultry Farms

G. Grilli;
2023

Abstract

The level of implementation of biosecurity measures (BMs), the reasons for not implementing BMs and the effectiveness of BMs were assessed according to the perceptions of stakeholders (i.e., farmers and advisors) in Italian poultry farms. For this purpose, data were collected using a questionnaire administered to advisors (n = 37) and farmers (n = 30) of conventional broiler (n = 13) and layer (n = 13), free-range broiler (n = 8) and layer (n = 10), turkey (n = 13), duck (n = 3) and breeder (n = 7) farms between April and September 2021. The frequency of the implementation of BMs was 66.97% and 81.14% according to the answers provided by the advisors and farmers, respectively, with the breeder sector showing the highest level of implementation (85.71%). “Not knowing advantages” (21.49% for advisors) and “other/specific reasons” (21.49% for advisors and 38.32% for farmers) were the most common answers regarding the lack of implementation of BMs for all poultry sectors. Only 31.09% of farmers acknowledged the effectiveness of not-implemented BMs in contrast to 61.02% of advisors, with the layers’ stakeholders being the most aware. The findings of this study may be useful for identifying failures in biosecurity and failures to develop intervention strategies to fulfil the biosecurity gaps still present in Italian poultry farms.
English
advisors; biosecurity; farmers; perception; poultry;
Settore VET/05 - Malattie Infettive degli Animali Domestici
Articolo
Esperti anonimi
Ricerca applicata
Pubblicazione scientifica
Goal 3: Good health and well-being
   Networking European poultry actors for enhancing the compliance of biosecurity measures for a sustainable production
   NETPOULSAFE
   European Commission
   Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
   101000728
18-ott-2023
MDPI
13
20
3246
1
15
15
Pubblicato
Periodico con rilevanza internazionale
scopus
orcid
pubmed
crossref
Aderisco
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Biosecurity Implementation in Italian Poultry Farms / A. Laconi, G. Tilli, F. Galuppo, G. Grilli, R. Souillard, A. Piccirillo. - In: ANIMALS. - ISSN 2076-2615. - 13:20(2023 Oct 18), pp. 3246.1-3246.15. [10.3390/ani13203246]
open
Prodotti della ricerca::01 - Articolo su periodico
6
262
Article (author)
Periodico con Impact Factor
A. Laconi, G. Tilli, F. Galuppo, G. Grilli, R. Souillard, A. Piccirillo
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
animals-13-03246 (3).pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Publisher's version/PDF
Dimensione 3.29 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.29 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2434/1026423
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 12
  • Scopus 17
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 17
  • OpenAlex ND
social impact